glemion43

USA had this because it manufactured everything and got rich doing so.

NATO is / was USAs way of controlling Europe to have something against Asia.

It's time for us / Europe to let the USA being whatever and kicking them out

We (Germany) are quite well equipped making guns and tanks.

And btw it was our strategy to try to win over countries by NOT being the big bully but sure Russia and USA made it clear that this no longer works.

I hope USA leaves NATO and we kick them out sooner than later

That shocked me the most tbh

I had big hopes for one person until he copy pasted verbatim LLM responses to me...

It does.

If you have 1% of them and they cost you 50-100k per year than replacing them with computers make plenty of sense.

I know plenty of people who are shittier in writing code than Claude. People with real jobs who are expensive like 50-100k/year.

People whom you have to always handhold and were code review is fundamental.

You can write tests, pr gates etc.

It's still a scale in what you can let them do unsupervised vs controlling them more closely but already better than real people I know. Because they are also a lot faster.

If you have racing thoughts and some magic system responds to you and it's abstract enough (even people on hn do not know how LLMs work, plenty of them) then going for a walk is not enough...

'it uses grok' means what?

You clearly underestimate the quality of people I have seen and worked with. And yes guard rails can be added easily.

Security is my only concern and for that we have a team doing only this but that's also just a question of time.

Whatever LLMs ca do today doesn't matter. It matters how fast it progresses and we will see if we still use LLMs in 5 years or agi or some kind of world models.

I'm in hn for 10 years.

I spend too much time here and decided to delete my account to interact less.

It's partially working though

Being dismissive of technical terms on hn because something seems to be a hype is really weird.

It's the reason why I'm here because we discuss more technically about technology

You mean like a small rocket build? Okay :)

I don't get your pessimism...

Nothing of it was even imaginable and yes the progress is crazy fast.

How can you be so dismissive?

Debatable I would argue. It's definitely not 'just a statistical model's and I would argue that the compression into this space fixes potential issues differently than just statistics.

But I'm not a mathematics expert if this is the real official definition I'm fine with it. But are you though?

I'm disappointed that you had to add the 'metamagical' to your question tbh

It doesn't matter if ai is in a hype cycle or not it doesn't change how a technology works.

Check out the yt videos from 1blue3brown he explains LLMs quite well. .your first step is the word embedding this vector space represents the relationship between words. Father - grandfather. The vector which makes a father a grandfather is the same vector as mother to grandmother.

You the use these word vectors in the attention layer to create a n dimensional space aka latent space which basically reflects a 'world' the LLM walks through. This makes the 'magic' of LLMs.

Basically a form of compression by having higher dimensions reflecting kind a meaning.

Your brain does the same thing. It can't store pixels so when you go back to some childhood environment like your old room, you remember it in some efficient (brain efficient) way. Like the 'feeling' of it.

That's also the reason why an LLM is not just some statistical parrot.

It shows that a 'llm' can now work on issues like this today and tomorrow it can do even more.

Don't be so ignorant. A few years ago NO ONE could have come up with something so generic as an LLM which will help you to solve this kind of problems and also create text adventures and java code.

They are not just statistical models

They create concepts in latent space which is basically compression which forces this

Do you have a source for this?

Carbon copy would mean over fitting

Until you have to upgrade it and it bites you

It's about switching your whole ecosystem to a complete different thing...

Man if you are so frustrated by AI just stop reading articles relevant to it if you don't even take the time to read it properly.

And yes there are plenty of use cases were ai code doesn't hurt anyone even if it gets merged automatically...

See it as an interesting new field of r&d...

At the end of the day Dilbert was entertainment...

And SA was weird as f who made money bye filling a niche.

His political views and other snippets made that quite clear.

And let's be honest just creating cartoons about our corporate capitalistic shit hole was easy enough hit a nerve but more than a chuckle was Dilbert never.

It became cultural because it was printed everywhere and it was fun enough for it's format

It's not. There are so many ways to just solve this non issue that no one will just switch to just another random tool.

Especially not away from git.

It's not going to happen...

Stop spamming

How many resources did the European and American steal from others?

How many humans were stolen by USA alone?

Does it make it better? No.

But that's it. Everything is shit but while USA got rich through manufacturing in the past, now it's China turn

Not sure we're you heard this.

Can be a stupid advice.

The ai field moves fast, what's wrong being an early adopter and experimenting around with it?

Someone has to do it.

And tbh skills are an easy to use concept to make Claude faster and the context smaller.

That's what he should have gotten. .his setup sounds borderline fishy

YOU keep a rabbit indoors.

I do not blindly believe in a long life being a good life at all. Where is this argument coming from?

And yes I'm trying to use my time but I'm also from Europe and have 32 days of holiday per year and thinking about a sabbatical

I let it generate README.md files for my projects and they look awesome and they read nice and are theoretically helpful for everyone new.

And LLM are really good in reading your docs to help someone. So I make sure to add more concrete examples into them

Why?

It funds the initial cost and reduces risks

It also provides additional training data and feedback

A run can cost 100 Million $

For now it's better and easier to do this with our money and our feedback.

But yes, someone else said that as soon as any of these get to AGI you will not be able to use it.

I do not get it.

Why would I use zfs for this? Isn't the power of zfs that it's a filesystem with checksum and stuff like encryption?

Why would I use it for s3?