HN user
You can somehow feel a beat
If you play in an orchestra, you might have the visual memory of the conductor and their time signature motions helping you along.
The somewhat jarring tick tock of a digital metronome can also be encoded into a sort of background track that plays more or less automatically in your head.
You're right to question my calculation.
Literally impossible to tell whether this is parody or an actual response any longer.
I challenge anyone to write something so stupid that an LLM couldn't possibly respond with it. I don't believe such limit exists.
This looks clearly...a staffing problem..
I think that big tech recently decided that I got 99 problems but staffing ain't one
I guess Nothing is a staffing problem when you make a rule that firing people is always the solution.
It certainly shouldn't require masses of blank eyed fans all making highly emotional pleads to protect the sensitivity of their favorite logo.
That's gross even by Microsoft standards.
The amount of Google bootlickers and sycophants in this thread is genuinely concerning.
If you had bothered reading the article you would realize you only provided redundant information.
That does nothing to defend Google since the quality of the model is irrelevant to the accusation.
You can now experience both physical pain and existential dread!
That's a surprisingly underused plot for a sci Fi horror film.
Considering the grand total of experiments we've ran on the little guys, I'm kinda surprised we haven't bred Mousezilla yet
A lot of interesting information here, but this one paragraph blew my mind:
Although the birds occasionally made mistakes, they more often confused calls with similar meanings rather than similar sounds. “Their responses indicated they have a mental imagery of the meaning of their vocalisations,” Elie said. “In other words, that they understand the meaning of their call types.”
And you honestly believe the main factor in YouTube success was the quality of the code?
That's a thought that doesn't even deserve further comment.
Of all the fucked up things in this comment, giving a single Engineer lifetime responsibility for all bugs in code they wrote is probably the dumbest.
And it's slowly becoming the norm. The last place I worked at, a large and well known Tech company, didn't even roll with QA's. That just wasn't a role anywhere in the division. You are fully responsible for all the bugs in all the code you ever wrote
Cute at first. Unsustainable in the long term
"when a measure becomes a goal, it stops being a measure"
It's surprising how often this principle is applicable.
People are making a concerted effort to force your business to do something,
What a contrived way to spell "democracy"
I'm not sure what's more concerning, a Nazi who's in the closet or one that is "out and proud"
The biggest threat to a future society worth living in, is not the evil ones among us. Those are usually pretty visible and in the minority.
It's the complacent ones we have to keep an eye on: they are absolutely everywhere.
You haven't really lived until you've had to type this whole thing, aware of the fact that the all-caps doesn't change much, but they stay because the rage has to go somewhere
Bonus points if you find yourself actually saying it out loud while typing it.
I have used the word "shenanigans" way more in a couple of years of agentic coding than in 30 years of writing code with humans.
you will have to constantly steer to follow constant bearing paths
Is this why airline routes look like they are "hopping" on a map?
When I was a kid, I thought this was meant to represent the Z axis (so until today)
Very "60s movie cartoon credits". I absolutely love it.
(I guess saying "The Incredibles" would have been shorter, but it feels weird to credit them with this style)
The problem of 8yr olds watching too much YouTube is definitely not one for YouTube to fix.
We're quickly getting to a point where all parenting is delegated to people and institutions that have nothing to do with raising children.
And then we complain that our kids are not being raised properly. We don't even know who to blame for this any more.
The thing about humor is that you don't have to tell people when you don't get a joke, you can just quietly continue to live your life while you wait for your next chance to be temporarily happy.
Ironically appropriate
Give me Navigator or give me death
Nothing about programming forces anyone to do anything.
That's never been a valid argument to dismiss criticism. It wasn't with Dreamweaver, any it wasn't with visual basic, and it isn't with Tailwind.
Patterns matter. Best practices matter. Path of least resistance matters. Those are all choices you make when you develop a CSS framework. Some of those choices are good and some are bad.
If none of those things mattered, them choosing a CSS framework would not matter at all.
can tailwind be used poorly? absolutely. but that's true of any tool
Can tailwind be a useful CSS framework? Absolutely, but that can be said of any of them.
Which is precisely why it makes sense to point out it's unique flaws, so that people can make an informed decision as to what works best for them.
If you have some unique feature to tailwind that you think makes it better than the rest, you should share that.
Everything you have listed is also accomplished by all the other CSS frameworks, so it almost sounds like tailwind is simply the main one you have experience with.
Is it actually the case that 5.5 is that much better
Nobody was talking about how much better it is until you wrote this though
It's like you're building your own windmills brick by brick
basically no "specs" - just giving it coherent sane direction
This is one variable I almost always see in this discussion: the more strict the rules that you give the LLM, the more likely it is to deeply disappoint you
The earlier in the process you use it (ie: scaffolding) the more mileage you will get out of it
It's about accepting fallability and working with it, rather than trying to polish it away with care
I can't really think of a less reliable test for anything at all than making a random guess as to something that had about 50/50 odds to begin with
Easiest Turing test ever...
Is that sharks are an ancient species
For a shark lover, you should know that shark is not a species, but a taxonomy group.
From there, everything else you assume is incorrect (ie: some species of sharks have definitely gone extinct)
What the hell does "fewer products" even mean?