gfna

I did. Also, I think i needed this bit of news today.

Well the article did mention it was in an undafe block

Been using gitkraken for ages and still like it, but they do make it harder and harder to like every update. The enshittification seems to have started and every update seems to bring more and more ai features, and pushing more ”cloud” features as well

We did this in a project where, due to reasons, we used a windowless, dull, claustrophobic meeting room for 6 months. Every now and then our daily was interrupted by the sight of an elephant on the screen

Gpl and mit licenses dont have multiple parameters

c# has been my go to language for everything except frontends for the past 15 years, but there are still some things I really miss from Rust. The top one is probably pattern matching. Sure C# has something similar with switch expressions, but with them you must assign something, and they cannot contain code blocks. Related to this something like enum variants is also missing, and therefore making something similar to Result or Option is not really feasible without it being quite hacky. Also being able to create new types from existing ones with eg struct Years(i64); and pass it around typed is quite nice in Rust (F# has something similar, however there it will then always also be assignable to i64, so is not very helpful for catching incorrect usage.

I would also like to see a study which considers the age of the pecorino. I seem to have an easier time of getting the proper emulsion with older drier pecorino, and less risk of clumping

Didnt recogize the english title before i read this comment and it immediately clicked. The copy i have is from the late 80s and even then it was a bit dated, but it didnt matter. Awesome book. Now 35 years later my kids and I sometimes spend hours looking through the same book. Even more dated now, but that probably makes it even more amazing for them and now they know how a tape recorder works \o/

Until gps fails and it starts repeatedly braking because it thinks it is somewhere else

Well this is going to be interesting if they rely on GPS. Possibly due to gps jamming by our neighbour country i have had to disable the feature where the car tries to predict the road ahead and suddenly brakes on the motorway because it thinks it is on a side road 10s of kilometers away.

Ford even did an ad campaign around this concept some years ago https://media.ford.com/content/fordmedia/fna/us/en/news/2017...

They way we did this was basically separate readonly and read/write tests. All the readonly tests would use the same instance with seeded data in parallel, and the read/write tests would get their own databases per test.

In finland this has been allowed since a few years ago. It is quite useful on narrow sidestreets in residential areas where it helps hunting for parking spaces. The biggest problem seems to be that now many misinterpret the law that one must leave 5 meters empty space before pedestrian crossings as being measured from the front of the car, ie not applying when parking on the ”wrong” side

I find it quite strange they didnt cancel the whole thing and redo the auction. Even normal stock exchanges do this occasionally due to glitches with clearly erroneous bids of smaller proportional sizes

Dont know about fanatic. I would use it mostly for web backends and there one important part for me has been how far one can get with very few third party dependencies. In a normal backend project it isnt uncommon to only need a handful of dependencies, most from eg microsoft namespaces. Compared to especially Node i see this as a huge security and reliability benefit

The old collection initialisation syntax has always felt clunky compared to many other languages, especially with more complex Dictionary types. At the same time it feels funny going back to having the type defined first since many have spent years converting explicit 'Type foo...' into 'var foo...' because the linter suggested it. Then again, perhaps this is one step towards more type inference and being able to leave out the type in more places

Regarding control of data, the strangest diacussions i have had is related to the customers being in control of the keys used to encrypt the data. For some reason it seems like using customer managed keys, or even customer managed hsm keys in the cloud is enough to keep the lawyers happy and all compliance in check. Of course anyone who has a basic understanding of key encryption and data encryption keys will know that the actual keys used to decrypt the data will be available at the cloud provider. So in the end it all comes down to, do the customers trust the cloud service provider

I have been waiting for being able to use this link for some time now. Perhaps the results of dragging sheep are correlated: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12507336/