HN user

frEdmbx

-13 karma
Posts0
Comments12
View on HN
No posts found.

Having children isn't easy. Having children near peak fertility is relatively easier than later. If a woman has the foresight to know that she would like to have a family first, and then work on her career, she could focus on finding a husband who can provide the resources necessary to both have children between 18-25, and support starting a business later.

This used to be common knowledge, and it was so for a reason. If someone doesn't want to go this route, they obviously have every right not to.. but they should understand the tradeoff.

But nothing is as awful as it not working out.

It only makes sense to plan, and have some sort of strategy. For those who feel it's their best option to freeze eggs, do it sooner rather than later. For young women who have more options, consider that if you both want to have a family, and want to have a business, one of the two things has a time sensitive deadline. You can choose to pursue a career, and go about it the way this lady suggests, or you can have a family first, and pursue your career for the rest of your life. Whatever you decide to do, consider your options, and formulate some sort of strategy. If you just put off considering what you want, and how you'll attain, you'll wake up one day realizing it's too late.

We should understand that all of this so called "censoring" is happening in/on private property, and not actually censoring. The owners of property have every right to set the conditions of use, if any, for any.

If Trump, et al, want to pretend that these private properties are actually essential, and the owners of them don't have the right to set whatever conditions, perhaps they should nationalize them, and auction them off to an acceptable group of sole US citizen bidders who agree to whatever standard.

...or the US could go back to respect property rights, despite it supposedly being out of fashion these days.

Everything we're witnessing is a result of the slavers prepping for the collapse of the world reserve fiat global enslavement system, and their attempts to maintain dominion throughout. The permissionless, decentralized, alternatives, aren't part of the same freefall as all the perpetually inflated fiat currencies, and are problem for them. https://fiatmarketcap.com/

They must convince us to accept the violations of speech, press, privacy, property, and arms, in order to deal with cryptocurrencies. If we're able to communicate, we're able to use cryptocurrencies. This is why we're being inundated with endless pretenses.. so that we'll be cowards willing to exchange essential liberties for the illusion of security.

"Offensive" means nothing today, and I'd suggest you stop allowing yourself and others to waste your time with it.

Have you actually compared the two? You'll notice one is far more insidious if you do.

Also, don't conveniently leave out the inflation of the world reserve fiat global enslavement system.

I know we can always opt to live in the woods, and barter, but you've got to take both into consideration to honestly consider what it is I said.

I'm still surprised the "99%" haven't made a pact to all use a cryptocurrency. I can understand why the 5 wealthiest nations that all want to be the one with a world reserve fiat global enslavement system would oppose such a thing.. but the bottom 190 nations with no chance of theirs being the world reserve currency should all get together and agree to use, contribute to, and defend Bitcoin. These allied nations could agree to contribute at least some minimum, and not exceed 25% of the mining power, with each nation limited to 1/195th of that total. Any attempt at corrupting should be seen as a crime, and act of war, against humanity.