fr2null

I enjoyed gamemaker a lot. Especially the ease of adding small snippets of code when you wanted to do something slightly more advanced than the normal editor allowed.

MS uses git with Azure DevOps, at least for all the repos I'm familiar with.

For me, Minecraft was amazing. I started on real logic with its redstone logic system. I started getting familiar with server management & Linux while trying to create a multiplayer server. I wrote my first code by writing plugins in have and interfacing with existing plugins. I learned how to solve problems by combining different components that other people made. It was truly amazing.

I don't know if it is still that great. I think the technical community is definitely smaller now, and the game itself is more of a game than it was back then. However, I still think it is really cool, and definitely different from all of the shooter games.

$99/year is literally nothing for most companies. Furthermore, Android has competing app stores, yet by far the biggest one is still the Play Store. Lots of developers (and users) did not and would not chose other distribution methods.

Single European datapoint, I'm currently in university.

In my country we have different levels of tertiary (?) education, as far as I can tell, lower levels of education have way more Snapchat use than Instagram. For most students of higher levels Snapchat is only used to share your night out with friend groups, but pretty much nothing else, while Instagram is used way more.

As a Young People™, this is not entirely true.

Stories are only partly chronological. The stories are grouped per user and in these groups they are chronological. However these groups are not chronological.

Secondly, posts are not for old people. Posts serve a different purpose than stories. The barrier to post is a lot higher, and they are definitely not used (anymore) to share that you are going to a restaurant/movie/etc, because stories took over that niche. However something like a (single!) post with (multiple) photos of your last holiday (with at least the first one including you) and some fun caption is still totally done.

I'm not even anything close to a climate expert, but I can imagine that this is because most of the world lives in places that are livable in our current climate.

Most of us don't live in Siberia or Greenland. Sure these places might become great because of climate change, but it doesn't matter, since barely anyone lives there.

In the places were we do live, the temperatures are already (semi) ok, meaning that increasing these temperatures will bother more people than it will help.

Furthermore, most people live close to water, which means a rising sea level will be bad for them. Maybe (probably not, but just imagine that) after the sea level has risen we have more viable land that is close to water. However, at that point all the current cities have been ruined by it, because they were built for the old water levels.

These skills are not that special. As far as I understand it, there are no exploits being used and editing the hosts file is not particularly hard. I expect that the executable is voluntary run by the user, since the user expects to run a real application/installer anyways.

The fastly monitoring/status page says: "Customers may experience increased origin load as global services return". Which sounds like the increased traffic is to be expected.

[1] status.fastly.com

If that is the case though, you are not really enabling SMS 2FA. It is just SMS (1F) authentication.

Real 2FA would (theoretically) never make your account less secure than 1FA, because even if the second factor has 0 security, it shouldn't decrease the security of the first factor.

However, it is true that this may not always be the case for imperfect implementations, like your example. I can aldo imagine that social engineering might have a higher succes ratio if the intruder can say "it really is me! I have the correct second factor, I just lost my first factor...".

I don't think it does, at least not for the security reasons you name.

If you are self-hosting a server, you may not have the latest and greatest features, but all the code you are running is open-source, so no sneaky backdoors (well, no more sneaky backdoors than the ones in the open source code).

If you are not self hosting, than it really doesn't matter if the server source code is open or not. There is not a single guarantee that they are actually running the that code on their server.

(For client code this is a different story of course, but we're talking about server source code)

I personally feel like we need more people like him to bring ideas and advice to people in charge. However, I would like the people that are actually in charge to be more careful and responsible.

I can understand that they hope to reduce the income gap between different races, but I don't understand why that means the selection criteria should include race.

I would think that it makes more sense to select based on 'wealth' (income, capital, etc.) instead. Since people of colour are disproportionately represented in the poorer population, this would help to reduce the income gap between races (since more people of colour are accepted into the program), without excluding the few white families that could also really benefit from this.

From my personal experience, people that eat less or no meat have a healthier lifestyle in general. I am wondering if that also plays a part in the results.

Not with public transport, but in my (Dutch) city I can get everywhere, safely, within a reasonable amount of time, at all times of the day, by bike. From one end to the other wouldn't be exactly 15 minutes, but it would be under 30. With an electronic bike you can probably make that 20 minutes.

While most of the comments on the Twitter thread use fancy functions from common libraries, you should be able to solve this problem without the need for googling and without those fancy functions.

While I agree that this is way to basic to test AD skills, if it's really true that there is a sizable percentage of people that is unable to solve this problem, this might be a good way to weed those out, before starting with the 'real' questions.

Multiple reasons:

1. Most people just want a website to work. (I know I do) 2. Because how are you gonna do support on a website when the website looks different for everyone involved? Are you only going to offer support for the basic text version? In that case, aren't you still kind off deciding how it looks, only now it looks ugly? 3. Branding. You want people to instantly recognize your product/brand. 4. To push features you want to be used, for better (handy new ones) or worse (advertising, generating bullshit metrics).

Probably a lot more than, but these just popped in my mind.

I don't agree. I think a module operator is common enough that it should be known, and even if they don't know it, they should be able to quickly make a module function. (Something like a while loop that decreases value a with value b while a>b and returns a)

I am by no means anything close to a physicist, but I would imagine it is because of the same principle as the inverse quare law. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse-square_law

While you might have a slight disadvantage if you ever really needed to talk about someone while they are standing next to you, I personally feel like I have a much bigger disadvantage since English is not my native language.

My English is at a C2 level, and as such I am able to understand and explain complex concepts with ease, however my debating and small talk skills are nowhere nears as good in English as they are in my native language. I find it much harder to convince people using English. I know that the only thing that will make it better is practice, but this takes a lot of time and effort.

Interestingly, swapping the glasses does seem to make the thumbnail Obama. [1]

1. https://twitter.com/SergioSemJ/status/1307493041742254080?s=...

We use our own email servers with our own IPs for automated emails (password resets, login tokens, welcome email, etc.) and MailChimp for newsletters. We have never had any real problem with Gmail or any other email provider.

We do see some of our clients having those problems, as far as we can tell, it is mostly caused by some sort of bad rating on IP blocks.

I think part of this is because Microsoft already has mountains of barely used legacy code they need to support. With every choice they remove, they can remove some of it, or at least make sure it doesn't grow.

I think Kong* does this rather well. They have a usable open source product that has a lot of the core functionality and it more than enough for small businesses and hobbyists. They also provide enterprise support and a enterprise products which includes functions that are typically used by enterprises (like fine grained auth).

* https://konghq.com/

I am also in the target demo, do not like the product, but the name sounds pretty good. Like "Have you seen her story?" "Did you see her last reel?" just sounds nice.

I don't think the key data that TikTok is gathering is anything you can really block on your phone. It doesn't ask for your phone number, it doesn't ask contacts, it doesn't ask for access to your messages. Instead, it looks for trends, it looks at who you are.

I (18 years old) have used TikTok for about 2 months, before deleting it because it simply got too addictive. In that time it learned what my favourite games are, what shows I watched as a child, my political views, my eating preferences, my technology preferences. The list goes on. While I'm not sure how much of this is saved in a black box and only known by the algorithm and how much they can extract, I'd argue that this is many times more valuable for China that my personal phone.

Furthermore the power to influence the algorithm, subtle and slightly of course, may slowly change the minds of literal millions of teens.

A specific version of their software was supported for 4 years. There are newer versions readily available. I think 4 years support for a product like this, while there are far newer versions is really good.

Why? I really enjoy the new edge chromium. It feels very smooth, is very fast and I have had no major problems.

I've tried chrome, but do not like where they are heading (removing AdBlock functionality, no privacy)

I've tried Firefox, but after years of chromium based browsers, it just felt off. No hard reason, I just didn't like it.

I tried numerous small browsers like Vivaldi and Brave, but they were not polished enough and started selling ads within my browser.

Edge does everything I want, supports Chrome plugins, feels modern.

It might lack functionality that you use on a daily basis, but I don't think it lacks any objectively basic functionality. In my opinion this is proven by the fact that thousands (millions?) of programmers, including me, work with VS Code on a daily basis.

They are partly funded by people's taxes. Commercials have more restrictions on them than on non-public channels. A maximum of 10% of airtime can be a commercial (on a yearly basis), with a 15% max per day. Commercials can only be before or after a program, not within. And just like commercial channels, you cannot sponsor news programs.

https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/media-en-publieke-o...