fooster

I don’t see it that way. What maga is going is completely and utterly outside the law.

Saying it is a matter of degree is an attempt to make what the current administration is doing is similar to what prior admins did. They are not. They are corrupt to the core. As for Biden he pardoned his son beacuse of a MAGA witchhunt.

Just to quote a poster above:

"You seem to think China is the evil polluter here. Just sort by per capita, and you'll see it's not even in the top 10% most polluting per capita."

Dude, really open your mind and stop arguing mindlessly. We're using this to great success on a serious sass product with hundreds of thousands of users. I'm not some AI influencer, or blowing smoke.

The source of errors can be whatever you like. Sentry, grep, whatever. Its not the point. The point is that many of these errors are real issues, and can be fixed automatically and safely by agentic systems. It really saves time, and work by our team leaving them to actually concentrate on the thing that delivers real value.

Not really? Imagine for example looking for http status code 500 in an api log over the past hour. The nice thing here is it doesn’t matter if you get them all because it’s reoccur (or not).

There are many sources of boring predictable errors which nonetheless are easy to miss and easy to fix. API validation errors for example.

Really they're not. But it seems you have decided that you, above all, know best.

You want your team spending their time fixing these simple errors? The secret sauce is in the triage. We've adopted solutions alot like this, and now our team spends its time on much more meaningful work.

I think you need to open your mind to the possibilities? For example:

- scanning logs for errors and

- opening issues which are then auto-triaged and

- PRs are opened for them and auto-reviewed and

- merged (and deployed).

This workflow alone is immensely powerful, and takes alot of burden off the team.

It doesn't feel strange to me at all. It feels like a very human response from the person that introduced the change. I great appreciate that, rather than ignoring the problem, or some canned corpspeak response.

Sure, but there are less assertions to check. The surface area and boundaries are smaller and more limited.

So less meticulous care then?

I don’t find that to be true?

I often have many active. Bug investigations, writing code, reviewing, checking logs after deploys and so on.

Cannot with our current level of technology. You are not going to provide the required level of power in Canada during the winter with wind or solar with todays battery technology.

I asked Claude:

"If combined wind+solar output drops to ~10% of nameplate during one of these (a standard threshold), a ~77 GW fleet sized to meet average winter demand produces ~7.7 GW against a ~22 GW cold-snap peak — a 14 GW shortfall that storage alone has to cover. That works out to roughly 340 GWh for a 1-day lull, ~1 TWh for 3 days, ~1.7 TWh for 5 days, ~2.4 TWh for a week, and ~3.4 TWh for 10 days. Ontario's entire current and under-construction battery fleet sits in the single-digit GWh range, so even a mild 3-day lull needs ~100-200x what's actually being built, and a serious week-plus event needs 400-600x — which is why lithium-ion batteries work fine for hourly duration but make no economic sense at the multi-day scale these lulls demand."

Another other things nuclear power plants don't take 15-20 to build in sensible economies. You also cannot use wind & solar + batteries to replace nuclear power.

buy glm 5.2 subscription and enjoy? and for the same money you get way more usage with glm?

ollama cloud, neuralwatt.

I don't think it is fair to say that opus or gpt 5.5 are subsidized? inference for both anthropic and openai are very profitable.

There are lots of subscription plans with acccess to GLM 5.2.

It is neither cheaper or easier to get this build?

"amateur crank claiming"

I don't know why you want to stoop to name calling which violates the guidelines and the spirit of this site.

"without any critical review" is also seemingly untrue: the post says Rutgers and Cambridge are reviewing it

Alot of the comments in this thread are disappointing. Rather that celebrating an achievement (whether or it is validated yet), many of you seem to want to put him down, or make it seem like claude did all the work.

Claiming that claude did all the work is patently ridiculous. Claude is a tool, like any other. The corpus of linear A is ~7500 characters across ~1500 inscriptions and claude, no matter how smart, doesn't just solve that on its own.

What a shame.

The number of doomers and luddites with extremely hyperbolic views on a site for tech entrepreneurs is wild.

Yeah, that totally didn't happen the majority of the time.

Build a more specific skill the for the exact workflow you want?

The mcp support gets more support because there is no cli.

You are trying to make friends not interview people. The easiest way to make new friends is to engage in a common activity. Sports, hobbies, music, clubs whatever. Join one and see what happens.

He’s not telling the truth.

https://economics.td.com/ca-canada-us-trade-balance

“for you”. Not because you were asked mind you.