HN user

fnj

359 karma
Posts0
Comments239
View on HN
No posts found.

Reminds me of the ludicrous idea of medical savings accounts. Hardly anyone below the top 0.1% could ever hope to "save" enough money and put it away to cover a medical or legal disaster or a really bad accident involving personal injury or destruction of extremely valuable property.

It just isn't a realistic proposition. Insurance with all its flaws exists for good reason.

Mine is beat and barely holding together and it is at 97_000 miles.

You are ridiculously hard on your capital equipment. It must be nice not to have a care in the world for your expensive possessions. Personally I couldn't bring myself to torture fine machinery like that.

A Review of Perl 6 9 years ago

I found this a nifty intro to perl6. I am a 70 year old retiree and have 37 years of C programming and some C++, perl5, and other languages. This is the first time I've been able to make the slightest headway digging perl6.

so it seems that Oracle could in fact sue.

Says the SFC. But Oracle has had plenty of time and they have not sued. In fact, they have not criticized Canonical for integrating ZFS.

One theory is that Canonical has essentially forced Oracle to decide whether it wants to crack down on inclusion of CDDL-licensed code being shipped with Ubuntu's stock kernel, so Red Hat may be waiting to see if Oracle sweeps in or not before following suit.

That is not a "theory" that anyone who understands the basics of the licenses adheres to. The possible threat is that linux' GPL could attack ZFS; not the other way round. There is nothing in the CDDL in the way of using ZFS in linux.

They can't legally use anything except CDDL. If anyone could just pick and choose to alter the licensing, there wouldn't be any point in having licences.

I disagree with the use of the word "deprecating"

Then you disagree (literally) with Red Hat's official statement as a matter of fact (not opinion). From Chapter 53, RHEL 7.4 release notes: "Btrfs has been deprecated ... Red Hat will not be moving Btrfs to a fully supported feature and it will be removed in a future major release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux."[0]

Pretty definitive.

[0] https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterp...

Zfs on Linux has data loss bugs.

Please don't spread untruths. Somebody who doesn't know better might actually believe you.

"human-readable" file sizes).

Nothing is more human readable than "123,456,789", so I think the problem is just the way you go about making them human readable. I couldn't agree more that lurching between B, kB, MB, and GB just because the file size changes it extremely jarring and disconcerting, and actually makes comparing the size much more difficult.

Sounds a bit extreme, but I am always puzzled by people who think dark backgrounds are just fine. Light all the way for me!

What would people think if all web pages on the internet had ugly black backgrounds?