HN user

firat

19 karma

[ my public key: https://keybase.io/fcb; my proof: https://keybase.io/fcb/sigs/wYQwPjt09-BtDugXvzoTYjkku71m88OAYXvPq8zBoU4 ]

Posts0
Comments15
View on HN
No posts found.

That's interesting. Have you linked dynamically? Maybe the author is talking about a statically linked binary, since he uses terms like "bare metal" and "final binary". Even if that takes an extra 120k, maybe additional throw statements won't be so significant.

Weightless Project 13 years ago

Where is the money coming from? Why wait for people to lose weight if they already have the money?

I'll assume the device manufacturers are donating the money. Looks like a marketing gimmick to me.

Bullshit.

Here is why: Yemeni government != Yemeni people. The authorities, probably, don't mind letting US drones kill people, simply because it won't be them getting killed.

Imagine the US military firing tear gas and water cannons on protesters in Turkey and saying "It's OK, your government gave us permission". The major problem in the Middle East is that, the governments can get away with not giving a fuck about the people.

I agree that iOS 6 layout is ridiculous and far from usable.

However, if you are building an app for Picasa, it better have "Picasa" in its name. The results are probably sorted by relevance (whatever that might be) and not only by ratings.

I am already considering to drop OS X after the lawsuit, but I only read 2 paragraphs before I decided to look for this comment in HN before reading further.

Okay, I understand that the formal definition of "idempotent" is different than what the author means. What is the correct term to use in this case?

Edit: Next paragraph says:

  This is a very useful property in many situations, as it means that an operation can
  be repeated or retried as often as necessary without causing unintended effects.
  With non-idempotent operations, the algorithm may have to keep track of whether the
  operation was already performed or not.
"A change in state" would be an unintended effect I think.

I don't think this is the right way to think about it. The ending "state" might be the same, but the output of the first logout operation would be "change of state: logged in -> logged out". In the second case, however, it would be "no change in state". It does different things under different circumstances.

The problem is I watch the movies when I want to watch them. Flash is embedded in random. You can always have click-to-flash solutions but those are usually buggy and there are other solid arguments in the list.