HN user

feu

85 karma
Posts0
Comments45
View on HN
No posts found.

Colleagues, ex-colleagues, friends, family, everyone. The few who I have talked to that still want an office, have been in leadership positions, and usually this is from those who are higher up in the ranks.

That's the problem with looking at a limited number of opinions, I've seen a different consensus in people I've spoken to. Only 1 person (out of around 30) expressed a desire to remain completely remote and never go back to the office, while the rest favoured a hybrid approach. None of those I talked to (including a couple in the C-suite) expressed a desire to return to the office full-time.

That completely destroys a whole class of games. How do you suggest I get 60 of my friends together at once for a game of Apex Legends?

You'll never completely stop people cheating, but that doesn't mean that game developers should just give up. Thankfully the people clamouring for less, rather than more, anticheat is relegated to a vocal minority.

But given that they want to go from Mongo to a graph DB, the fear is that this is someone who is only chasing the next cool technology and not solving an underlying business problem.

To be fair to the teach lead, I do feel like it was the other way around. MongoDB was foisted on us on a new project (we were previously SQL) by a software architect who left soon after. I've never felt that MongoDB was a good fit for what we want to do, but I want to return to SQL.

Is the latter not the case? I'm genuinely asking here, as this is a point of view expressed by my tech lead (though in our case it's a graph DB vs an existing MongoDB setup).

They're deliberately trying to get people to take on debt rather than just do card payments

So what? It's 0% interest. It's incredibly helpful to have easy-access financing to split purchases across a few months.

even simple things like buying a book through a web site requires declining several offers for paying with credit.

This sounds so specific it seems like you're taking a bad experience with one website and pretending all websites are like this. Most e-commerce sites I've used in the past year offer Klarna or some similar service and all of them have been implemented as just another option in a set of radio buttons.

The idea that they have been "bypassed" is indeed a fabrication. That phrasing implies that long-term studies are usually carried out in vaccine trials and an exception was made for COVID-19 vaccines. That is not the case. Long-term studies are always carried out after a vaccine has already hit the market.

It would be correct to say that no long-term studies have taken place, not that they have been "bypassed."

Recommending the standard set of modules is the opposite of "going simple." Poetry removes a lot of the complexity and user-unfriendliness inherent in the previous set of standard modules. For any Python beginner coming from another popular language Poetry is likely going to be very similar to the dependency and package management in the language they're coming from. Python's standard set of modules sticks out like a sore thumb when compared to the tools in other popular languages.

primarily because the structural typing of TS makes thing much easier to refactor compared to the nominal typing of Java.

That's interesting. This year I switched from server-side Java to server-side TS and I find that refactoring is incredibly painful when compared to Java. I think any productivity gains in the greenfield portion of a TS project are quickly offset by the pain of refactoring and debugging during maintenance. It's really disappointing, as I quite like TS.