fadsasda432

Hi, I once tried that, but I ran into problems with lazyness. In particular my data structure was rather simple (famous gap data structure), but editing "large" files (>1000LOC) became rather unpleasant (too big input-feedback latency).

However I managed to build a _very_ basic proof-of-concept editor (no dependencies) in just a few hundreds lines of code which I could explain, but until now I was too shy to share it as it did not involve magic abstract Haskell-foo ... ;)

This is not a critique to the author, but for me, who just did classic webdev (server side templated html), this was very surprising.

I am not that into webdev, but shouldn't a page like HN be fast TODAY, as it has very basic functionality (CRUD)? I mean if this is slow, how can I expect acceptable performance from involved applications?

Follow-up to that. If you go into cycling do not bother about equipment, but about the cycling.

Very true. In particular a too small condom can be very painful ...

I agree with that. We live in a marketing bubble and the power of advertising will decrease a lot in the next years as new generations will just get more and more immune to it. Which is actually a good thing.

Thank you, that was an interesting talk. It is also hilarious how they discuss the problem of multiplying 2000 * 8000, but I blame the herb.