evrial

Go for it if ineducable.

Except it unnecessary complexity is very convenient to limit the code audit to only domain experts.

If you say "sour grapes", then back down your bold statement or don't say at all.

They are sourced mostly from the same population and crawled from everything can be crawled.

That's explanation of central limit theorem in statistics. And any language is mostly statistics and models are good at statistical guessing of the next word or token.

When was the temperature on Earth at absolute zero?

Bourgeois have fun with number crushers. Clowns, make comparison of metrics normalized to token/second/watt and token/second/per memory stick of ram 8gb, 16gb, 32gb and consumer GPUs.

So you saved yourself overhead in lines of code by pushing that overhead to people who don't want Nextcloud platform as slow piece of irreparable bloatware.

That's right, we're not playing democracy here, go play democracy with php, ruby and javascript idiots. Do we need second ruby or lisp? Answer is clear.

PEP author didn't give a though why the awesome and flexible lisp-like family of languages is in roadside of industry, and Clojure the most popular has 24 place in github and declining. Just think about why this pathetic graveyard has no potence to offer any AI/Data science library. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Lisp-family_programmin...

Just because simply one way isn't enough.