HN user
True, I suppose it is also useful for video editing and other uses.
The article describe it as a gaming chip, though. Might be because of the site's target audience? I don't know them.
I understand where you are coming from.
But as a gamer who hasn't been able to make a significant upgrade to my rig in 6 years due to memory price and redirected processor engineering funding (all of it due to AI), it really bother me.
It's a gaming chip, literally a lower-cost downgrade of an AI chip meant for gamers instead of AI.
Why would it benchmarked for AI in these circumstances?
Beside, the second page look like those unnecessary AI benchmark to me. I wouldn't recognise such for certain or be aible to estimate their quality, but it's what their summary say.
I would argue that any U.S. government data is pro-car propaganda.
For exemple, pedestrian killed by motorist are too often not counted as a motorist issue, but a pedestrian at the wrong place issue.
150 million functionally illiterate people in Europe
1/3 of the population functionally illiterate in Europe seems beyond wild to me.
Are you talking about technical illiteracy? security illiteracy?
Or do you mean they can't read english, which is a very different thing.
Loss of liability is what company are built for, see the meaning of LLC as an exemple.
Of course, it is only their employees that are impacted instead of their bottom line, they might be more tolerant?
It's not voting policy, it's protectionism.
It's all about limiting foreign build vehicle encroachment on US market.
They should be able to recall a plane for a safety flaw. In which case they have to pay for the upgrade themselves.
If the airline doesn't comply afterward, it would be on them.
But they didn't issue a recall, so they wouldn't have to pay for the fix, an over 200 people paid the price instead.
At least, that's how I read the blame distribution.
You are naming a year outside those he named, it might influence significantly the result.
Another demonstration of why depending on any American service is not worth the cost.
Use no U.S. part, and you can sell to the whole world. Use U.S. part, and you might ne restricted to the U.S.
No way this can backfire in any way.
> (generous exemption for those who didn't vote for the orange dildo).
Those who could but didn't vote aren't blameless either.
Of course, huge investment need to be paid for somehow.
Still a worthwhile investment in most case.
Wouldn't it change the hash, making push requests conflict in many case?
I mean higher yeah, my bad, and too late to edit now.
Wasn't WW1 basically finished when U.S. troops reached the front line?
The US is very much an outlier.
This give a very different picture:
As disgusted as I am with Israel's action over the last 80 years, put the blame where it belong.
5k is far from nothing, it is more than enough in any country than subsidize higher education.
Which is most of the world at this point.
No, it is a tool.
My IDE doesn't pretend to be a cohauthor of my work, neither should an LLM.
He isn't blaming React (or Copilot), but those who used them in context they had no place in.
How much the land is worth is only one of the parameters.
Notoriously, the maintenance cost for suburbs and their infrastructure is significantly lower than the tax they bring. Shouldn't that be a major point un tax decisions?
Is it possible that he was paid to play such add to his passengers?
There two main mobile OS in the space, one moron-proof but limited, the other a bit more permissive, but slightly less secure for it.
The problem is that most apps target only those two, and the second is trying to moron-proof, loosing most of it value to part of its users, while the apps are still locked in.
They are the same people, they just converted to another religion since the diaspora that saw some of the population leave 2000 years ago.
A simpler answer would simply be that, if you lay someone off on the basis that an AI can replace their entire job functionality, you have to keep paying their salary dollar for dollar until they find something else to do.
This just incentivize them to find different official reason for firing. Like missed deadlines (that sudently became shorter) or in computing job code quality (due to reduced deadlines).
This incentivizes companies to try and figure out creative ways to continue using their existing workforce to maximize the value they get out of AI systems.
This doesnothing for the current issue of job market entry positions, where there is the most pressure from AI. Only help people only in position.
That extra step mean selling what remains at low cost might be more financially interesting than if they could destroy it 'on site'. Not a perfect solution, but it push the incentives in the right direction.
Nowadays, "Free Market" mostly means its actors are free of the consequences of their externalities.
You seems to mistake a corruption/grift problem for a wealth redistribution scheme issue.
They do not need to be linked, they generally aren't, in the EU at least.
If the money is use to pay local developer, who reinvest most of it in a taxed local economy, it would need a HUGE amount of devs to match up the government's current MS license cost.
And nuclear fuel is also imported (but refined locally), so not sure it should be counted as 'local' in this case.
Not switching to metric for time is reasonable, because there are already two existing 'natural' units for time (the day and the year), and they don't align on each other in metric (a year of exactly 1000 days would be so much easier, but we'll have to deal with reality as it is... or accelerate the rotation speed of the planet I suppose).
So long as we live on earth, metric time won't make much sense.