eteos

Maybe it's different with Alexa (I use Google Home), but I disagree with the premise of the article. Firstly, for a product that you use every day I don't see it as much effort to learn to say the right commands. Once you know it, you don't unlearn it. I also have the Google Hub, and an app for controlling the lightning (Phillips Hue), but I rarely interact with those, since via that route it takes more steps and more time to get what I want.

Pretty sure this uses GPT-3, not ChatGPT. It's basically the same but the main differences are that GPT-3 has an API, and that ChatGPT is made to function more like a chatbot.

I don't wanna sound like I'm nitpicking. I just think it's confusing to use the wrong term here, especially because some commenters here (understandably) think you are scraping data.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but using all of this will still leave the option open for enforcers to go after the registrar or the cdn or host of the endpoint. So there is always a 'secondary infringer' to find, that is capable of removing (the endpoint of) the content.

There is no such thing as a constitutional right to play on chess.com

I must say its pretty special to retire because of investing in such a short period. Must be with a great starting capital.

I think music, especially pop music, is in a completely different ball park than text or images. An AI can't just make a catchy song only with a training model and some rules. Successful musicians have a feel for what we will like and what will be trendy. An AI can't do that, at least not for a while to come. Well, thats just my thoughts, I'm not an expert on this.

"If a lawyer comes claiming ..." This doesn't happen in Europe. GDPR will not be used for individual claims from lawyers. Especially independant developers have nothing to worry about if they act in good faith. The enforcers of GDPR in each country don't have enough resources to act on everything which means only the biggest companies have to worry about claims. Also, it's not the responsibility of the web developer to make a website/platform comply to a law. The client who pays you to make the website is responsible and can hire a jurist to tell the developer what the requirements of the product are.

You are working with sensative data but there is no privacy statement.

Yes, it's neat in the sense of seamless (privacy violation) integration.

This is likely because our immume system is not familliar with this virus yet.

An HTTP status code implies the domain name was properly resolved to the IP of the HTTP server.

This is not true. Your ISP can in theory route the requested address to whatever they want. In the Netherlands TPB is blocked and my ISP returns a 200 status code which shows their blocking landing page. Other ISPs give a 30x redirect to their domain.

Basically the ISP can do a man in the middle attack.

If youve encountered a lot of 0.2x, then the 2x developer is the 10x developer you are looking for!

Disabling Javascript doesn't work anymore, as you could've tried or read in these StackOverflow anwsers.

Changing /edit to /preview, like Anon9001 suggests, does work.

The theory is that the required technological advancement to create such a simulation is plausible to be achieved in x amount of time, as long as we keep progressing. Could be a thousand or a million years.

Do you guys know this doesn't count for corporations (which I presume you have the most aversion against)? For example, it's irrelevant how long mr Disney has been dead because the company still exists.

Whats wrong with inheritance? It is a big drive for economy. Or is it just that you don't like rich people?

Cheers, was looking for mirror.

For some reason alot of people talk like they have the right to have one 10$ subscription that provides every movie and series in the world, with the reasoning that it's possible with music. That is a utopia. All the movies/series are more expensive than all the songs. Especially production-wise.

It wouldbbe bice

Right, suddenly CF cares about 'law'.

Scam (lots of phishing and fake webshops), spam, piracy, illegal pornography, it's all chilling on CF's network en masse. When they get notified about this, do you think they terminate that client? No, they will just come up with some dogmatic story [1] and ignore every call to action/cooperation.

"we are rebuilding the Internet, and we don't believe that we or anyone else should have the right to tell people what content they can and cannot publish online."

Yes, ladies and gentleman, he said it. In 2012 Mr Prince was trying to build a proprietary internet. These days he would never say that again. I mean, it's just laughable that you feel zero responsibility over your clients. Hence they publicly deny this now of course.

CloudFlare: it would be great if you start actively participating in abuse prevention, instead of behaving like an offshore/bulletproof provider behind red 'n blue curtains.

[1] https://blog.cloudflare.com/thoughts-on-abuse/

I like the concept and it looks good. Some criticism: After pausing a video, it still goes to the next video after a couple of seconds. I'm also seeing way too many XHR requests on a paused video. It's like the next video is already playing but invisible? The network tab just looks way too messy.

That's like saying you need to plug the cable ;) Sounds more like some cross browser issue.