HN user
Dane County, Wisconsin Sheriff's Office took steps to prevent unauthorized surveillance.
"With the contract set to expire on May 31st, the Sheriff’s Office informed Flock Safety that all 26 cameras must be removed by that date. When removal did not occur, the Sheriff’s Office took steps to ensure the cameras were not in use and placed covers over them."
I've been watching satellites at all hours of the night for decades. You might want to double check with reality on that sunrise/sunset claim.
I'm not confident after all government investigations and lawsuits against Elon and his companies were dropped when Elon illegally accessed government systems, illegally took government data, illegally terminated government employees, and illegally eliminated government departments and programs while creating billions in expenses while pretending his intention was to help anyone but himself.
But sure, the FCC might take it seriously.
That's such low effort nonsense.
I think you articulated the administration's intentions well.
Xenophobia driven policies are intentionally cruel.
Why would you have a problem with public dollars being used for effective communication?
The defeatist mindsets expressed in these comments seem more like a way to shed any sort of personal accountability for participating in a solution that doesn't kill billions of people than a reflection of reality.
There are many solutions.
Would this show bias of Gallup or of Verge or of the Ai training data? How would you determine which?
Why is velocity the overriding goal?
But the company in the article isn't filling the gap. Farm owners want the technology. They don't want to be held hostage over the technology when it needs maintenance, repair, or adaptation after the initial sale.
How are you in any way qualified to know that what you said is correct, besides that being a wild guess?
That's a lot of words to cover for being intentionally obtuse.
The ICE agent was 100% in the wrong, completely, totally unjustified in murdering Renee Good.
Nothing you wrote changes that.
Quibi doesn't seem like a good example. It wasn't marketed as the next big thing. It was a trial balloon that popped.
You voted against free speech. The sooner you can admit to that the better.
Trump has been very clearly against free speech well before 2015. He's been anti-American and anti-constituion well before he came down that escalator.
It doesn't make me feel better that you're still pretending otherwise.
Our current President disagrees and has pardoned political violence. Take it up with him.
Those contracts are direct subsidies. They would not exist in the private market. Government spending subsidizes whatever it spends on.
I don't consider these researchers luddites.
https://machinelearning.apple.com/research/illusion-of-think...
Who is this a problem for?
Who are you granting grace to? Who are you denying it to?
We know the answers to these questions for Norris.
If you look at the wider context, it's harder to deny the racism.
You should reconsider it.
You just said that he entered legally. Then you said the opposite.
WTF are you talking about? Next time you fail to obey a yellow light signal, you'd be rightfully distraught if you were put in prison and someone were to say that you deserved it because you should have thought about stopping at the yellow as the law prescribed.
You're going to need to explain how all of the unethical actions of Tech companies don't count for your statement to make sense.
Seems like he's recommending secondary sources over Wikipedia as a tertiary source.
The line cook is relatively as valuable as they were in the past, they're just being out leveraged by people asserting a self-centered entitlement mentality.
Your unwillingness to read the primary sources linked in the Wikipedia article because they show how you're flat out wrong indicates that your entire thought process can be disregarded at no cost.
https://www.euronews.com/2025/01/29/us-freeze-on-foreign-aid...
https://usafacts.org/answers/how-much-foreign-aid-does-the-u...
The Department of State switching to a less accessible font is not a nothing burger to all the people who now have more difficulty reading the documents. It reinforces the tone of international relations being put forward by the administration to the detriment of everyone in the country.
If it's legible, the terms of a lease are way more important than the typeface. Anyone wasting time on the typeface of the contract would worry me more than comfort me with regard to knowing what's important.