That shouldn't be happening.
The way it should work, is that if the keys are nearby the user that owns them, the tracker shouldn't be giving unknown tracker notifications to other nearby users.
HN user
iOS Engineer.
Website: https://eduardo.engineer/
That shouldn't be happening.
The way it should work, is that if the keys are nearby the user that owns them, the tracker shouldn't be giving unknown tracker notifications to other nearby users.
iCloud Backups can be E2EE encrypted if you enable advanced data protection.
Curious that you are saying the travel eSIMs are a scam.
I've used them quite a lot around Europe and once or twice in Africa (and even locally, when I didn't have an unlimited data plan and used all of my allotted data by my carrier and it was easier to just buy an eSIM), and my experience has always been pretty good.
That feature only exists on family/team accounts, and in that case the account that is allowed to perform recoveries has an escrow of the vault passwords of other team members.
1Password themselves don't hold these keys.
Not who you are replying to, but I can confirm it!
Some exist. I have the Philip 279M1RV, which is 4K 144Hz with a built-in KVM. It's not a perfect monitor, but was the best one I could find for my needs, spec-wise.
It also doesn’t have VRR support which makes that 144hz screen a lot worse. I also have a ROG Ally and I am still happy with my purchase.
Check your inbox. :)
So that’s what it is!
SMS 2FA from Apple actually implements that standard from what I can see.
Works for me both under rosetta and native arm64 (macOS 12.2.1, M1 Max) - both by double-clicking the executable and using zsh.
Only thing I had to do was rename the file to open it in Finder first because of gatekeeper requirements.
arch -x86_64 ./hello2
hello world
./hello2
hello worldAhhhh the times we live in, when it specifically needs to be said that something like a image optimizer is privacy-aware. :(
Anyway - looks nice and something I'll use from time to time, thanks!
There is actually! I was told about it over the phone with an App Review rep a few weeks ago. I didn't write it down unfortunately, but I think it was appreview@apple.com - googling for that e-mail address returns some results, so I am pretty positive that was it.
Some of your facts are wrong. The basic 16-inch MacBook Pro has also an i7-9750H, not a years-old processor like you said. Additionally... the screen on the MacBook Pro is leaps above gaming laptops for working with photos and video - I know that, since I actually recommended one of those to a friend who wanted a laptop for some photo editing, and he ended up returning it because the colors on the screen were all wrong, and it didn't appear to be fixable.
That's not to say that the MSI may not be a better deal... But you can't just compare the specs you said, there's more at stake.
I don't see anything good coming out of this law, honestly. I've read some other commenters saying that Apple doesn't want to talk to small banks, but I find that to be the complete opposite of my experience.
Here in Portugal, only one bank supports Apple Pay, and it's a small one (apart from N26/Revolut, the online ones). None of the bigger banks support it. Instead, they all support a national app that uses QR codes on iOS and NFC/QR on Android for payments (but its UX is much worse, even on Android where it uses NFC, and has a load of other problems - since it's properietary it doesn't work internationally, etc.). Of course, there is no Google Pay support at all here, and I blame the fact that NFC payments are supported on their own app. There's even less incentive for them to support Google Pay at all, and that's exactly what happened. I'm afraid that Apple Pay would be dropped if Apple was forced to open up NFC for payments.