HN user

earcaraxe

77 karma
Posts0
Comments22
View on HN
No posts found.

Look at mister test driven development over here. Hey everyone this guy writes unit tests.

I'm joking here but I think that a lot of people ignore basics like writing unit tests, and that statically typed languages will break a lot more quickly and predictably for people who are lazier, since it enforces structure.

However, I agree with you. Also I think that the people who really push for static typing are the kinds of people who already would write unit tests.

"There were also a couple of companies that assigned me coding tests where they asked me to “print a ladder” and “find repeating numbers.” I rejected those tests not because of arrogance but because my skills were beyond what they thought is needed from the role. And yes, the roles were for a Software Architect. However, instead of testing my skills in architecture and logic, I had to print a ladder on the screen."

This is arrogance. In my experience, most companies throw simple tests even at people applying for higher positions for several reasons:

1. It very quickly sorts out people who lie on their resume

2. You can tell a lot about a person's skill level by how they answer even a simple coding assignment - how are functions and variables named, does it take in args, what style is the commenting, does it do error handling, input validation, which language features are used to solve it etc, etc?

Just to clarify he was saying that the guy with the pneumothorax walked out because he didn't need CPR in the first place

He's incredibly ageist and cynical about man's abilities to do great things. Definitely a curmudgeon, but mixed in with some good quotes and advice.

I particularly thought this was cute:

"It is one of the first duties of a professor, for example, in any subject, to exaggerate a little both the importance of his subject and his own importance in it. A man who is always asking ‘Is what I do worth while?’ and ‘Am I the right person to do it?’ will always be ineffective himself and a discouragement to others. He must shut his eyes a little and think a little more of his subject and himself than they deserve."

Oh absolutely, I'm not trying to discredit the work, I think it could be a big step. I'm just tired of seeing headlines every month or so that say "cure for cancer discovered" when it's only a promising incremental step that's only in mouse trials.

Titles like these can be cruel for people fighting or with loved ones fighting because it's a false sense of hope for those who currently need it.

I am stoked about the research though, the ability to actually distinguish between cancer and noncancerous cells is a huge breakthrough if this translates into humans.

The US gov't is working with contractors to make use of cubesats built from commercial off the shelf products to be able to produce cheap constellations of satellites for a fraction of the cost (hundreds of thousands per satellite instead of hundreds of millions) of what they've been paying. These satellites also will have significantly shorter lifespans (1-2 years) so they'll need more frequent launches to replenish the fleets, but the advantage is they can keep upgrading with the latest technology without being locked into a 10 or 20 year old machine. SpaceX dropping the cost of launches fits right into this.

Well, the dude is german, so he isn't in US jurisdiction so he's probably less concerned about it. Still jeopardizing his personal security for sure, and probably going to make it difficult to travel internationally.

To be fair, they're quite similar in their MOA and dopamine receptor sensitivities. Methamphetamine is also prescribed as a treatment for ADHD in the US under the trade name desoxyn in similar milligram dosages to adderall. The main difference is that methamphetamine has lower norepinephrine excitation.

I'm honestly surprised that it's taken you this long to go out and say this. I've loved reading your articles and essays about startups, and I've soaked up all of it, but one of your big topics is dealing with investors. I've talked with a lot of entrepreneurs, and bootstrapping seems to slow things down slightly, but with the technology available as cheaply as it is, living expenses are the biggest thing, and if people can figure out how to live on the margin, they could launch a startup on next to no money at all.

This essay definitely gives me a sense of fear and dread. What Paul makes out to be a good thing, really gives me a nasty reaction. Startups becoming ubiquitous? If startups really become so prevalent, I feel like it's not necessarily worth doing. Aren't there only so many things that web startups can do? I'm afraid of startups becoming "the cool thing to do," for students in technical fields. College starting to game students specifically for working on startups. 1000 applications, 10000 applications, it stops becoming novel, it feels like a sellout.