e38383

Start at the OS level, you have maybe another 6-12 month left to find something built without AI.

So, basically: just bear with us a little bit longer and then drop all computer usage (this will include every tech which blinks).

I probably could find some really useful things for it to help me … but all software nowadays only works outside my earth region :(

This time even for pro.

You probably need to include EN16931, XRechnung, Factur-X, ZUGFeRD, … and how they all called, the new standard for electronic invoices.

The wording sounds like this is a problem or even something to solve. Why?

But let's start with the basics: - Why are these people not countable? Shoudn't we not at least just be able to get a good statistical number on this? We do the same for all people on (and off) this planet. - Let's assume we have a number: how to we know that they sit and are alone and every day? This sounds to me like an overspecific approach. - Why would anyone join local groups? You normally can't find people you want to interact with within a specific range, that's the great thing about social media or the internet overall: you don't need to be in a geographic range.

And the last one: what are you trying to solve here?

I just wanted to submit that too.

A really great article about the state of vibe coding at the end of 2025.

This guy produces real software, ships it, and — as he claims himself — often don’t read the code anymore.

"attempted" would be more accurate IMO.

I still think that the word redacted is meant to destroy the original text, it might not remove the metadata (e.g. length).

Redaction is done mostly in ways with a possibility to reveal the underlying text, but all this is not redacted in my understanding of the word. I always liked the english word for this – the german word "schwärzen" just means to "blacken" the text and this was never the same for me.

But after further research I must agree with you, it just means to obscure or remove, but not clearly just remove. I have been using it for years in a stronger meaning that it's really meant.

One more but: we hopefully can all agree that putting a black bar over some text which still is just copy/pasteable is not even obscuring.

It’s either redacted or not. There is no "bad". The text is either there or it isn’t, sorry but this is a binary option and not on a spectrum from bad to good.

Thank you, I came here just to verify that no "hack" was involved.

Location: Mannheim, Germany

Remote: Yes (hybrid/onsite ok)

Willing to relocate: No

Technologies: AI, IT-Security, Data Privacy, GDPR, SOC2, ISO27001, project/product management, Mail (dovecot, postfix, …), simple web stuff (with Cursor, Lovable – not only "vibe"/AI), Linux, …

CV: https://uweschwarz.eu/

Email: mail@uweschwarz.eu

I've been in the enterprise sector for over 20 years, seen everything, started as Linux guy, now project lead, also started with AI. I'm doing mainly contracting within the EU, but I'm open for everything.

The page is a bit sparse ;)

What will the pricing be after the beta? And what are you exactly offering? Only a database or also authentication or storage?

Can you maybe compare it to something established like Supabase?

Does this support every feature of the messengers you support?

Why is every second article about this claiming that it’s automatic? It needs to be turned on or at least there was no mention of automatic in the original blog post.

I really hope that we can continue training AI the same way we train humans – basically for free.

I don’t think one is still „old“ if they died. The oldest person is normally the oldest person alive and that’s the opposite of dead.

So, no: there is still an oldest person. It just switched to someone else, happens all the time. It’s a bit more apparent with the youngest person, everyone was the youngest person at birth - at least for a short amount of time and then it switched to the next one.

Up to 500 emails / month

100 tests emails/month | 50 emails/day

100 test emails/day

50 emails/day

What are the limits really and what is the difference between a test email and a non-test email?

Thanks for mentioning that, I must have missed the Duo pricing. It seems the blog post is from April, so at least I‘m not years behind :)

This is really a good price, let‘s see if I get my wife to switch over.

Last time I checked it wasn‘t possible to configure multiple aliases via this method and it wasn‘t possible to add aliases after adding an account this way.

This is a few years back, so it might have changed.

My wish list: 1. iOS native sync, preferable without Active Sync. This includes syncing of read states. 2. Custom domains for families and small business without shelling out $10 per user and month. 3. A shared mailbox within the custom domain as „family“ contact mailbox. At least two people should be able to read it, possibly sync read states AND answer from that address, including sent mails need to be stored in this mailbox. 4. A very simple way to setup the accounts on different systems, especially iOS.

AFAIK, except 4 those are already solved, but not within one provider - without paying those mentioned $10/u/m.

eza -l --time-style=+%Y%m%d --no-user --no-permissions

„which swaps the standard white background for black“

I tried, but I just can’t believe anything written after that statement. The default was white (or green or orange) on black.

All these white backgrounds are fairly new - probably there are more years with white than black backgrounds, but that’s not how my old brain think of time.

Most likely something I did a wrong `touch` on.

I can hear my thoughts and even speak to myself. I don't picture myself doing that and I don't have any image in my head.

Maybe it "looks" like a comic with only speech bubbles. It's still not the right image, because there is no image, but it also doesn't feel like a total void.

I read about three times as fast as other people. I'm still not better in absorbing the information, I also make errors and miss key points.

The difference is that a book is already in a format I don't need to convert (to images) anymore.

About the 3x: if I need to show someone something to read on a screen and need to wait to scroll to the next page, I just read it 3 times and scroll then, it normally fits a "normal" reading speed.

The difference is the recognition. If you tell me "to go right at the wall with the lion on it and left after the blue door" you're giving me an immense difficult task. If you want to totally screw me just show me pictures of the wall and the blue door, I probably be really lost.

It's not only about what is visualizable, but also what form of representation is comparable. I can read a map in a matter of seconds and find my way. I can find a car plate within my line of sight instantly. The way to the parking lot behind the <insert picture of something> and finding the blue <insert car brand> there is basically impossible for me. Of course I'm able to concentrate, but it doesn't come naturally.

As the saying goes: it's impossible to imagine a new color.

I don't think that's part of "visualization" itself. I don't visualize a scene, but I still can take a long time if it's interesting or has a lot of detail. I remember reading the Lord of the Rings books and it has really long descriptions of the scenery and sometime it took me a very long time to read it, just so I can get all the details. In other parts I read over it as fast as I could to get on with the story.

I imagine that's the same for "both sides".

Movies and TV shows are a really exciting topic. But first to your questions: You are totally right, I can't recall a scene from a movie with all the details. I couldn't paint it, as I'm not seeing it like when it's right in front of me (in the movie). But I could definitely describe it and it will sound indistinguishable from what you would describe, the difference is that I'm remembering the description and you are remembering the scene itself.

Rewatching a movie is the same, I remember seeing the movie and I also remember all the scenes (the ones I remember); you might remember a scene by color and "images", I remember it by description or concept. But the result is the same: I remember having seen it.

A really nice perk (for me) is that I don't remember the individual actors. I remember the role played, but not who has played it. It's not like I cannot distinguish actors from another, but I just don't remember actor X played this and that role. I really don't understand the problems with changing actors in sequels, it's the same role; maybe played a little bit different, but still the same role.

I know a total of maybe 5 to 10 actors which I recognize among different movies.

Yes, it's still the same memory as everything else. It's more like a book or description.

It's still not the norm. I have normal dreams without being wake in them or waking up from them. According to my "research" (asking friends and family) I dream a little bit less often than other people - maybe one dream per week or two.

No, like images it's just the concept of the sound. As I can identify images (also people or faces), I can identify sounds, but I can't imagine them.

Instead of a picture of a forest and some cracking of wood, I just have these words in my head and not the real picture/sound.

Same for every other sense.

Answered here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40758231

I do dream, but most of the time not with a visual representation. It’s more like reading a book. There are very few occasions when I wake up and really have the memory of an image. But this fades so fast that I’m not able to really describe the image. I retain the memory of having a picture in my head. And it’s boring most of the time, because it happens in the middle of a dream and it’s basically just the last frame paused.

And about the book: Haha, I never thought of visualizing the images described in a book. To rephrase: it’s like knowing the words from a book, but not how the described image looks like.

No