dumberquestions

If I'm going to read it wrong might as well have an LLM to blame.

You're right, should've gotten some LLM to summarize it instead of skimming.

"..and in some benchmarks like DeepSWE by Datacurve, we observe up to 65%, all at a lower cost per output token."

"3.6 Flash delivers higher precision with fewer unwanted code edits and reduced execution loops, as seen in DeepSWE (49% vs. 37%)"

So which one is it? 65% or 49%?

Do you really think popular opinion always gets reflected on policy?

I wonder if certain checks should be put in place to prevent a few companies from hoarding a valuable and limited resource many other industries rely on.

Things are relative.

The trend might've stalled or even reversed if it weren't for AI, we can't just assume the same end was written in stone.

It's still not obvious that AI is uniquely environmentally destructive compared to some other "non-essential" industries, and it gets even less obvious when that's weighed against its current and potential benefits. Where the datacenters are built could probably be better regulated but that issue isn't inherent to the technology.

I think all issues regarding intellectual property rights actually fall under automation, even if everyone could stop their works from being fed to AI, enough public domain/open source works will be used, and enough people will license/donate their work for AI training for us to eventually get to the same point, it would just take longer, everything would be ethically sourced and people whose jobs are getting automated would still be unhappy.

The only real problem is the consolidation of wealth and power, everything else feels like a cope or a distraction.

Codex is opensource, there are other opensource harnesses.

Other ones aren't this invasive with user data.

25 is an odd choice, you incentivise them to have children but you're also making it more difficult for them to do so, and not enough will have children before 25. 30 or even 35 would make more sense.

Even if more testosterone means more DHT, most of the variability in hair loss is explained by differences in DHT sensitivity levels.