dudisubekti

Yeah, western lecture on human rights carry no weight these days lol (Israel support, Trump doing Trump thing, war in Iran, etc). They ruined their own reputation so the rest of the world just tuned out.

Speaking as a relatively unprivileged kid from Southeast Asia, my parents were so busy working they just didn't have time and energy to care about me, let alone how well i fold my laundry.

But that's just one data point.

What?

There's already a better system today: mine launchers (remote minelaying system)

last laugh

Can I ask your reasoning?

Currently hydrogen is just oil with extra steps. Efficient electrolysis either needs ultra-rare materials like iridium and platinum, or exotic ceramics for continuous high-temperature electrolysis.

I personally can't see how this arrangement can supplant oil and batteries.

Doesn't stop people from mass-producing and consuming beef lol, people just don't care aside from performative lip-service.

You don't seem to like the "CCP" and their political views, but why are you using their sponsored models?

Why don't you exclusively host and use the open-weight western models, even if right now they don't perform as well?

I'd like to know the psychology behind this, because your actions feel contradictory to me.

Ah I see. Yeah the graphics are probably AI-generated, and AIs do struggle with unit consistency in charts.

(For another example, the charts in the August 2025 GPT-5 presentation)

This label?

Figure 1: Overview of Qwen-AgentWorld. Top: Qwen-AgentWorld is a unified native language world model across seven domains. Bottom: We explore two complementary strategies for applying world modeling to enhance language agents (mainly using the 35B-A3B model as agent): Decouple and Unify , where the world model serves as the environment simulator and agent foundation model, respectively.

Where is the mistake?

Yeah money is just a fancy paper if you can't translate it to actual productivity.

I feel like '/s' has ruined irony on the internet. Irony is at its best if left ambiguous, lol.

Crazy how people make light of this, when you can see the alternative today: India.

Sorry Indians reading this for throwing shade at India, but I just want to point out that making 1 billion of people not poor is freaking hard.

Other than Taiwan declaring independence, I don't see any reason why China will rush to take the island.

At the very least they would wait until they cracked EUV and mass-produce the chips, and that is still 4-5 years away at the earliest.

I guess... but I think, at its core, a good coding harness usually includes:

- well-crafted system prompt that follows best practices

- good contextual reminder prompts (when an llm got stuck in an infinite loop and times out, forgets how to use tools, or needs recurring best practice reminders, etc)

- well-written ergonomic tools the llm can use (read/write files, read diffs, browse the internet, etc)

I dont think these are anything special. The deepest moat I can think of is, proprietary models can be specifically trained to use their proprietary harnesses, so they are more token-efficient and make less tool call and file editing mistakes.

However in my experience, I'm as comfortable working with my own homemade harness as with Claude Code, so I don't think it's a deep moat...

But harness is relatively easy to code yourself?

They're just system prompt composer, with some tool functions that the LLM can invoke. I've vibe coded my own in just one day.

I mean, yeah... but I bet if Zig gets really popular, it will attract similarly toxic weirdoes.

Also if we're only judging whole communities by their toxic minorities, then... I'm so sorry Americans reading this, I've got some bad news for you, lol

What I'm trying to say is, it's best to try <a thing> for yourself, and see if it fits your preferences, rather than letting others stop you from exploring.

The community seems normal? Take this popular thread for example:

https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/1tcrmjs/rewrite_bun_i...

Many seems to be very skeptical and concerned about Bun being vibecoded.

The rest of the subreddit is basically people showing off their work.

What? This doesn't make sense, how is it Rust's fault if people are being lazy and tribal?

Even today, their ban of contraception alone is a cause of many misery in poor Catholic-majority countries.

I wouldn't even bother reading whatever they wrote.

Yeah, but it's miles better than giving Anthropic and OpenAI your data. At least Deepseek is releasing open-weight models and a lot of open-source libraries.

If you're concerned about espionage then the only solution is host the models yourself, which again, only open-weight models like Deepseek enable you to do this.

But...

Take electricity adoption for example, with your adage then it means unreasonable pro-electricity people vs unreasonable anti-electricity people. We know how this turns out, I don't see a lot of people joining the Amish.

It's okay to have strong opinions (be "unreasonable"), but in the end humanity as a whole (the "reasonable" people) will judge whether your opinion is a good one or not. Only time will tell.

Thanks for the warm wishes, stranger

I see no point in denying the technology, it's best to do what we humans do best: adapt with it.

Well, I forget arcane params all the time before AIs too. I rely on terminal history search and google.

Well I'm not saying that the blog writer shouldn't have written the article.

I've read the article and to me it reads like a very angry rant, which is why I commented with something akin to "bro calm down"

I have a coworker like that too, my pet theory is that they're not passionate about their job to begin with. It's just something that can pay their bills.

While waiting for Claude to finish, we talked about our hobbies outside of work, and the same guy will go into deep details on how steroids and the HPG axis works, and even gave me a spreadsheet with several NCBI PubMed links on the topic.

I think we are all naturally be more creative and opinionated in things we are interested in.

You don't need super big brain IQ to be creative and expressive, all you need is simply a strong opinion on something, and you don't let AI (or other people) dictate otherwise.

Now the skill issue lies in whether your opinion is a good idea or not lol.

Black-and-white thinking like this is not healthy.

You can still do creative thinking while using AI as a powerful tool at your disposal.

Some mathematicians like Terence Tao are comfortable doing this, for example.

I think you have too high an expectation of the scientific community.

People work there, and it will have people's dramas and problems, like everywhere else: fraud, crime, jealousy, simple mistakes, etc.

Despite their imperfections, the reason people with power trust their consensus more is because they are a lot more useful than other groups of people.

If you reject this statement, you can start by joining the Amish, since virtually all modern technology is built on top of the scientific community's consensus and work.

We can literally observe cosmic microwave background and it fits our prediction that the universe was denser and hotter. It is a scientific theory.

You might be confusing the established big bang with the more speculative cosmic inflation model. They're very closely related.

But... there's Deepseek v3.2 in your link (rank 7)

Are you against inefficiency or just LLMs? If it's the former, I assure you LLMs are nowhere near the top of the list lol

You should start from beef industry.