HN user
https://dsp.name/
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/dsporter; my proof: https://keybase.io/dsporter/sigs/pV4cfrY-7Jk69s-cPgasBBqciu-Q6t82ox4CkY02Lws ]
It’s very efficient. The net electrical energy saved using the latent heat of water is 30 to 100+ times greater than the energy required to desalinate or wastewater recycle the same volume of water.
Definitely not all. Look into 401(k) self-directed brokerage accounts.
There was an opportunity to apply over a decade ago. The plan is to open another window for applications next year.
Unfortunately, I don’t think end-to-end encryption guarantees much when it comes to legal intercept in proprietary messaging apps. The intercept functionality could be done in the client and capture data, not just metadata.
This is false, and they even claim so just a few paragraphs down
It’s not false. The first quote is about asymmetric, and the latter is about symmetric.
What I’ve read suggests that vitamin d toxicity from sun exposure isn’t a thing because your body self regulates production.
I laughed. :)
In “Outlive” Attia said the goal was for men to farmer’s carry their body weight for a minute (half BW per hand).
[citation needed]
I believe you’re thinking of Five Eyes.
This doesn’t reproduce for me. Also, it sounds more like a bug than a “disabling.”
product market fit
Yes, the standard withholding methods produce poor results when pay does not arrive evenly through the whole year.
It is possible for employers to use alternative methods. IRS Pub. 15-T sec. 6 has details on common alternatives and constraints.
I have no idea to what extent employers support any of these alternative methods. I imagine it's limited to employers where much of their workforce is overwithheld using the standard methods. One example might be a school district where teachers are only paid when in session.
withholding is set at a fixed rate at the beginning of the year
This is not correct. It's calculated per pay period. Please see IRS Publication 15 and 15-T.
In the random case you’re reading a whole page to get some tiny struct.
can the client assume that communication received on that socket is actually from the server?
No.
Obligatory djb warnings: https://ntruprime.cr.yp.to/warnings.html
“The Cascade of Attention-Deficit Teenagers Model”
It never happens.
Many intentionally run without mitigations.
DNS over HTTPS uses TCP-based http/2
DoH (ietf rfc 8484) recommends http/2 as a minimum, http/3 is a valid DoH transport.
which is less efficient
What kind of efficiency are you referencing? This is not a clear cut issue.
UDP-based QUIC (aka http/3)
The linked rfc uses only the quic transport, not http/3.
Do we have more protocols for dns than commonly used dns record types yet? There’s been quite a proliferation recently. :)
The board accepted the offer yesterday.
Your comment reminds me of “What If You Only Invested at Market Peaks?”
https://awealthofcommonsense.com/2020/12/what-if-you-only-in...
Total return reinvests, yes.
The official tinydns site has always been at <https://cr.yp.to/djbdns.html>.
A third-party used to maintain some relevant content on tinydns.org. They let the domain lapse around 2017, and whatever is there now is trash.
Harvard filed first
UC filed seven months earlier:
https://genotopia.scienceblog.com/573/a-whig-history-of-cris...
Would you be able to share more about your use cases? I’m currently working on some related tech, and your perspective would be helpful.