driuha

Afaik, not exactly, collagen has hydroxyproline which is attributed for skin\hair\joint improvement.

Its basically a government spyware. Perhaps you can compare it with WeChat but you can't really compare it to FB or Google because the political regimes are different in the US vs China & Russia. All the other conclusions can be drawn from this point.

"almost all controversy would be removed from among Philosophers, if they were always to agree as to the meaning of words" (c)

One could say it was always the case, you can cut through bs and have a productive dialogue if you define the meaning of words before the message, i.e. scientific papers do that. The problem with that is that most people won't do it because its hard and on the other end you will get ostracized most of the time if you try doing that in casual conversations. This problem is even bigger in politics which is a game of large numbers and you have to be as stupid as possible for your message to reach the masses.

They are profitable for a few years now, afaik visa/master pays you a share of their profit each time customer makes a transaction(i.e. share of merchant fee). There are also credits, loans, exchange fees, subscription fees i.e. a lot products that make them money.

It will resolve some but it will probably add additional errors like confuse bricks from previous photo with each other. You need to separate pieces and take multiple shots like in that Lego-sorter video. You can probably get away with filming the bricks from different angles, preprocessing video and using that to feed into nn.

It was already done: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04JkdHEX3Yk

And its never going to work, at least in its current form. The problem is that some bricks will look the same from top while being different on the bottom. That produces wrong suggestions and you can only discover it when you checked all pieces that are needed for the suggested model. Perhaps it can work with basic collection of pieces, like Lego classic but it can't work with random heap I throw at it.

It was said by main propagandists who are the official mouths of kremlin on national tv channels. Also it was said by Lukashenka.

I'm applying explanation to a fact. "Fiction" is not the right property to categorize explanations, the right one would be "probability". So yes, anyone can dream up an explanation and then judge if one is more probable than the other.

Occam's razor is the idea that, in trying to understand something, getting unnecessary information out of the way is the fastest way to the truth or to the best explanation (c) wiki

The explanation about dictator's desire for power(now also life) is more simple than geopolitics and cultural suppression.

And about the needs of the Russian people: I don't remember Russians having a debate about starting a full scale war. Maybe Putin thinks its what they need but if there was a real debate we can safely assume people would prioritize having in-house toilets and a million other things that are suddenly became not so important.

Can serious person use Occam's razor? The explanation for war in Ukraine is that Putin wants to stay in power, plain and simple.

That's what vendors will tell you but customers get visits from customs all the time. And in that unfortunate case you'll get charged with contraband plus everything they'll get on you on top of that. You probably won't have proper opsec and your house will be searched and electronics will be confiscated, plus there will be some surveillance prior to that. I'm not talking specifically about spores here, more about general onion shopping. Its easy to get in the mindset that nobody cares about a user but if you get unlucky your life will take quite a hit.