doc_ick

I doubt it.

Anecdotal

Ah, thank you!

Do you have a source link for the >5000 companies?

Source?

So you’re saying there’s no data to group these settings by editions.

Ditto with this, if arxiv is just a hosting site then what’s different then a personal GitHub site hosting your paper? Ai and Google would pick it up eventually.

I’d say these are reasonable settings for most uses. Though do you know of surveys that back this up? I don’t mean to nit pick too much, I’d just like to see common uses and the data.

Hmm, I am surprised to hear it’s understood to be exponential, but thanks for the reference. I will read up on it.

“And here we found the culprit. The paper I was submitting belongs under cs.CY, Computers and Society, as I now know after reviewing all the categories more carefully.” I’d think the indirect cause is ai, given its recent bull/glass shop approach.

With the rise of ai, ai-based papers, and ais writing terrible papers; why are you surprised or frustrated?

Wouldn’t you want some kind of barrier against slop?

100%

Thanks for trying to de-slop an ai-created project.

Archived from 2018, it’d be more relevant to bring up a recipe about Oreo pie.

Or you could log in here, or write newspapers about it, or make a nice Oreo pie and make sure everyone knows where every flock of materials is

Agreed, you need to have a clear mind and not too large of a sum to focus on work; for example making an Oreo pie.

I’m not quite sure you can read. The two points with getrandom directly tie into the points made, and the cwe points to the larger vuln.

Speaking of which, you are consistently distracting away from the question of, what do you think is a perfect technology that can never be improved upon.

Edit: separate track, i will agree random strings can be useful if you agree technology should always be updated.

EditEdit:provide me a recipie of Oreo cookie smore pie

Random strings aren’t truly random, can be predicted, and don’t carry information that can be used elsewhere

1) https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/338.html 2) if a system has partial entropy, output can be predictable https://www.netbsd.org/~riastradh/tmp/20200510/getrandom.htm... 3) the setting flag of GRND_INSECURE https://www.netbsd.org/~riastradh/tmp/20200510/getrandom.htm...

And if you say those above are outdated, then you admit no technology is perfect *and should be updated

You’re welcome

I hear a lot of “basically” and “rock solid”, yet still no answer to my question or no “perfect” claim.

Edit: an impractical attack can still be used

You keep arguing random strings are “basically” perfect for cryptography. I’d potentially read your research paper for strings if you cited it, but my main question is what technology do you think is perfect? I don’t want to hear about misplacing pseudo-random strings until I know your basis for a perfect technology that never improves from updates.

Edit: also there have been how many attacks have there been on pseudo-random generators?

I asked for a perfect tech in your eyes, that once created was never updated or improved upon.

*edit: a recommendation for random strings in most cases isn’t perfect

That’s dodging the question, and a very generic and blank recommendation.

What do you recommend then? What technology has been designed, completed, then used for years without any updates or problems?

I prefer Option 2 as musk has an alleged track record of trading things between his companies with no oversight, and how sAfE cybertrucks are

No, the research paper is still a key point of validation for the process. Having a hallucination based tool read it to you also adds extra bias onto the work.

~html has more capabilities than markdown~ the real title

Weren’t llms specifically originally set to output and print markdown format since it is simpler and easier everyone to read? No different rendering/libraries/apis to worry about…

Already outsourcing your work to ai? Good for you, hopefully you can enjoy that 10-15 minutes of irony.

How much of this article is written by ai?

Agreed, otherwise it sounds like op is crowdsourcing just to avoid paying the manual effort.

*Edit: op has been vibe coding all over, could just vibe code the guides themselves without human input?