This is a consequence of money getting more expensive. When rates are low, investors pile money into non-revenue producing startups in hopes that something will return 1000x. Now rates are up and the smart money is moving elsewhere.
HN user
digger250
Yes. As well as asbestos and occupational exposure to inhaled particles.
You'd still have your token though.
You are not affected, but there are people in the world besides yourself who do things differently than you.
Huh? I thought the title was a perfect description of the article. A dude who mostly uses ruby optimizes a piece of Python code. That's it.
I think AWS needs a good UX designer. I find that using AWS can be overwhelming at first. Here's a few suggestions:
1. Take "Amazon" out of every product name. Have a look at this list for example: http://docs.aws.amazon.com/general/latest/gr/aws_service_lim... This adds nothing but clutter to the page.
2. Stop calling everything "Simple". If it's simple, people will be able to tell for themselves. Calling things simple potentially makes people feel dumb if they have a problem with it.
3. The sheer number of offerings (over 18 groups with multiple items) on the "Services" tab of the AWS management console is overwhelming. I'd have a designer see if there was a better way of organizing things.
There are only 10 or so remaining issues in the beta milestone.
When I run the benchmark in C-ruby (2.0.0) I get:
real 2m35.450s
user 2m35.257s
sys 0m0.139s
On jruby with invokedynamic: time ruby -Xcompile.invokedynamic=true file2.rb C-large-1.in
real 1m17.711s
user 1m15.618s
sys 0m0.830s
In jruby without invokedynamic
time ruby file2.rb C-large-1.in real 1m37.856s
user 1m39.260s
sys 0m0.854sSalting the password should defeat the rainbow table, right?