dalenw

Apple is free and low end given the context of what was being produced and sold to businesses decades ago.

I have a largish library at about 400gb. I synced it completely using the mobile app. It took a few months (it just finished in early June) but it’ll eventually do it. I know there are other ways but I figured this was the laziest way to do it.

Ollama Cloud has a $20 a month subscription. They say they retain 0 information. And rather than token based billing, it's GPU time billing.

I actually implemented this yesterday. The gist is this library runs the MCP server: https://csharp.sdk.modelcontextprotocol.io/concepts/identity...

Then I build an authbroker application using openid to handle client registration and build the jwt. End result is something that can determine tool availability and permission using an employees department, or other criteria.

So yeah the dynamic client registration is needed.

Agreed. It still feels like Zed is only good for writing scripts.

Not OP but things like this: (BunnyCDN has been silently losing our production files for 15 months) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47710845

It's almost always a system design issue. Outside of a few specific use cases with big data, I struggle to imagine when I'd use NoSQL, especially in an application or data analytics scenario. At the end of the data, your data should be structured in a predictable manner, and it most likely relates to other data. So just use SQL.

I recently "vibe coded" a long term background job runner service... thing. It's rather specific to my job and a pre-existing solution didn't exist. I already knew what I wanted the code to be, so it was just a matter of explaining explicitly what I wanted to the AI. Software engineering concepts, patterns, al that stuff. And at the end of the day(s) it took about the same amount of time to code it with AI than it would've taken by hand.

It was a lot of reviewing and proofreading and just verifying everything by hand. The only thing that saved me time was writing the test suite for it.

Would I do it again? Maybe. It was kinda fun programming by explaining an idea in plain english than just writing the code itself. But I heavily relied on software engineering skills, especially those theory classes from university to best explain how it should be structured and written. And of course being able to understand what it outputs. I do not think that someone with no prior software engineering knowledge could do the same thing that I did.

I've heard a lot of people prefer OpenCode to Claude Code, myself included. Having tried both, I find myself having a much better time in OpenCode. Have you tried it?

I'll admit it lacks on the agent teams side but I tend to use AI sparingly compared to others on my team.

I think so. The last few months have shown us that it isn't necessarily the models themselves that provide good results, but the tooling / harness around it. Codex, Opus, GLM 5, Kimi 2.5, etc. all each have their quirks. Use a harness like opencode and give the model the right amount of context, they'll all perform well and you'll get a correct answer every time.

So in my opinion, in a scenario like this where the token output is near instant but you're running a lower tier model, good tooling can overcome the differences between a frontier cloud model.

I wonder if there's something to be said about screenshots preventing context poisoning vs parsing. Or in other words, the "poison" would have to be visible and obvious on the page where as it could be easily hidden in the DOM.

And I do know there are ways to hide data like watermarks in images but I do not know if that would be able to poison an AI.

While I don't use Gemini, I'm betting they'll end up being the cheapest in the future because Google is developing the entire stack, instead of relying on GPUs. I think that puts them in a much better position than other companies like OpenAI.

https://cloud.google.com/tpu

I use garage at home, single node setup. It's very easy and fast, I'm happy with it. You're missing out on a UI for it, but MountainDuck / CyberDuck solves that problem for me.

I used to be a big ruby/rails fan but I have to agree with you. I now write c-sharp and it's a lot less stressful than Ruby. If a Ruby/Rails codebases get to a large enough point it's really difficult to keep track of what types a method you wrote accepts. You end up just constantly double checking your own code. Or you end up with a few type checks and/or type conversions at the top of every method. And maybe I was doing it wrong because it was early on in my career. But when a method can accept literally anything and return literally anything, not even a strong IDE like RubyMine can save you.

For Mac, yes and no. IIRC you don't need a developer's license to build and sign software for yourself. But you do need one to distribute pre-built software.

To be fair, there’s a massive banner on their front page warning users it’s in beta. Until they settle on a proper release it’ll continue to be a bit chaotic. All software development is like that.

I just built it on macos 15.3.1 without issues, if that helps.

Same, in a way. I've been using it for a couple months on my MacBook Pro M2 Max, zero issues. Recently I installed it on my work laptop, M4 Max, and I get frequent crashes. No idea why it would make a difference.

They're saying that when someone uses a privacy token to search, they cannot track which account it's tied to. Therefor, they cannot track limits & billing.

I use it at work with asp.net MVC, no issues either. I did have to use Webpacker though...

I like Ruby a lot, but I find it large codebases get convoluted since it doesn't have a proper typing system. RBS doesn't count lol. Even RubyMine by JetBrains gets confused with classes and such in a "large" codebase I wrote (50k lines give or take). And that's with doing things the proper Ruby/Rails way, with full RBS files for everything.

I've always been a fan of cloudflare or firebase for static sites.