HN user

ctb9

79 karma
Posts0
Comments53
View on HN
No posts found.

Welp, this changes my 2024 outlook.

I've been using Airplane.dev since their first post on HN, and I was repeatedly delighted with the way the product "just worked", I thought they made great choices about code vs. config vs. admin, and their feature development velocity was superb.

I was ready to really jump in and move beyond simple internal tools to build complex, mission critical internal systems in airplane.

Does anyone have any suggestions? I would love to leverage the powerful Airtable UI, but their scripting vs. custom extension offerings have always felt underpowered and needlessly complex, respectively.

Agreed, if anything this placebo finding supports your idea that the experience mediates the improvement more than the chemical itself.

I once attended a talk by a neuroscientist at UCSF, Adam Gazzaley, that really helped me see what the future of medicine could look like if we appreciated the power of experience, and more importantly if we could measure and then alter said experience in a realtime closed-loop system. My takeaway was that one day we might think of blasting our synapses with SSRIs or Adderall similarly to civil war era surgeons...the bone saw does prevent gangrene, but in a such an inefficient way.

I was struck by this sentence: "I have no message for suffering humanity and, though I was bullied at school and lost my virginity like so many of us used to do in the old days, I have never been tempted to foist these and other harrowing personal experiences on the public."

Is Ian Fleming saying that he was sexually abused as a child?

I really like this. I keep bouncing between text-based todo lists and more visual/kanban tools, so this feels like the best of both worlds. (If I could stand the airtable/notion database view those tools would be great, but alas.)

One thing that's preventing me from dumping in a bunch of action items is that I can't figure out a way of creating tasks via the keyboard. Is this possible?

I would need an example project (the final product and template inside the tool) to give this a try.

As it stands you just get dumped into the builder with no guidance whatsoever. I wanted to evaluate the tool, but there's no way I could dedicate that kind of time to something I didn't know existed 5 minutes ago without even knowing what it's capable of building.

Surely you have made something complex and impressive with it, right?

I do. I met one of the founders about six months ago and got a single serving to try (before they started using the tubes).

A couple weeks ago I compared it head to head against starbucks Via while backpacking.

Sudden Coffee totally blew Starbucks Via away. It's about as much better than Via as Via is compared to the horrible Nestle stuff.

It's not going to replace my daily pourover, but for future camping trips I'll be drinking Sudden. For this use-case, the subscription model is a pain. I'd prefer to just buy two or three cases to have a supply and give some out to my outdoor friends/family.

It sounds like your QA team believes their purpose is to test that basic functionality is working as intended. This puts the focus on "checking the boxes" and not exploring edge cases or applying their deep knowledge of your product to try to find shortcomings.

I strongly believe that automating the repetitive and mindless aspects of the QA process is the crucial step to shifting their attitude. Automated UI tests can give everyone confidence within minutes that core functionality has not regressed. This allows the QA team to dive into a product or feature in a creative way and do their best to find the rough edges and help make the product better.

I have a consulting practice exclusively dedicated to helping startups with this very process: http://structurehq.com

Ask HN: Idea Sunday 12 years ago

There is a strong assumption here that you could encourage hundreds of people to express their opinion on this someone's shirts.

The value for the poster is clear; what is the value for the voter?

Where are you losing people? If no one is clicking get started, address the homepage first. If people look at products but still don't buy, start with your products page.

1. Are you performing split testing on major components of your landing page?

"Increase your brownie points!" strikes me as awkward and mathematical (makes me think $browniePoints++). Ask a few friends in your target market to help you brainstorm.

2. I almost missed the arrows to see more products per category. Make them more prominent and switch the circles in the top right for page numbers.

We're hiring engineering and (possibly) marketing interns.

Company Name: equipster

Company Size: 2 (soon to be 5-6)

Company URL: http://www.equipster.com

Position: (A) engineering intern (frontend and/or backend). (B) marketing intern.

Contact Email: chris@equipster.com

Skills Needed: (A) js/php/python. bonus: experience with large, gnarly datasets. (B) Online marketing, good writing ability, interest in the outdoors