corywadd

Guild.ai | ONSITE (San Francisco) | Full-time | https://www.guild.ai/

Gulid.ai is the control plane for agents. We're building a new way of orchestrating and sharing agents that mimics some of the best parts of Github, with the centralized control and credential management that enterprise shops need.

From our about us: We are builders at heart—founders, SREs, open-source stewards, architects of large systems, and people who love creating things from scratch. We believe AI should amplify the creativity of everyone who builds software, not just speed up tasks. If you’re technical, curious, customer-driven, and want to shape how the next generation of software is created, we’d be thrilled to work with you.

We have multiple open roles, including AI Engineer, Forward Deployed Engineer, and Software Engineers.

https://www.guild.ai/careers

VAX/VMS.

Agreed, people confuse the (totally expected) bumps and bruises of early adoption with somehow equating to "this technology is useless."

The Wright Brothers couldn't cross the Atlantic in their first flier and plenty of subsequent designs crashed and burned (literally). But now air travel is commonplace. Same will happen with AI, we just have to get past these early pains.

The same thing every DIY and shade tree mechanic uses to read codes and run service procedures.

Now you have me wondering if this is their real target, to go after people who are defeating CRM on their vehicles so they can repair them themselves or in their small mom-and-pop garage of choice. But right to repair is popular, so they have to claim it's for something else.

I would suggest the one exception to this would be courses explicitly designed to teach how to use AI, and how not to. But in that case, it's less "use AI to cheat on this course" and "AI is the tool this course is about."

Otherwise your suggestion makes sense.