HN user

coolness

129 karma

RL in natural sciences coolness at thundermail.com

Posts0
Comments37
View on HN
No posts found.

Slight tangent: i was wondering why DeepSeek would develop something like this. In the linked paper it says

In production, DeepSeek-OCR can generate training data for LLMs/VLMs at a scale of 200k+ pages per day (a single A100-40G).

That... doesn't sound legal

We mourn our craft 6 months ago

Great post. Super sad state of affairs but we move on and learn new things. Programming was always a tool and now the tool has changed from something that required skill and understanding to complaining to a neural net. Just have to focus on the problem being solved more.

Great post and amazing progress in this field! However, I have to wonder if some of these letters were part of the training data for Gemini, since they are well-known and someone has probably already done the painstaking work of transcribing them...

Great story and I'm sure the new math chops help her a lot during her studies.

In case anyone else is interested, it is possible to study computer science without any entrance exams due to the Digital Education for All initivative (https://www.helsinki.fi/fi/projektit/digital-education-all in Finnish, sorry). You get the full study right after completing 60 credits (out of a total 180 credits) worth of courses in the first year.

This is a great idea actually, this way you could also enforce that all the words appear _exactly once_ (by rejecting during sampling words that were already in the answer) which seemed to be a significant issue for me when I tried this.

I expect if you asked it to correct its output in a followup message, it could do so without much difficulty.

I had a similar idea to the author and tried this many times, albeit with the free version of ChatGPT. After getting wrong results, I prompted it to correct them, even telling the model explicitly that a category is wrong or doesn't make sense. Nothing I did made a difference.

My two cents on why this doesn't work has to do with the fact that the answer should contain a discrete set of words given in the prompt, and importantly, they should not be duplicated. I suspect that these currents models are not very good at following the instruction "the token should appear in the answer exactly once"

What an engagingly-written and interesting piece. I really enjoyed the glimpse into the lives of ordinary people somewhere where I may never get the opportunity to travel to.

The computer seems to move very slowly, and gets much more time for each move than me. Is this intended, or is it because everyone on HN is trying it out? Might be some sort of client - backend synch issue.

edit: the computer now flagged on my screen, but I did not get any message of a result

This is exactly what most people in this thread are missing. The copyright holder, i.e the creator of the code is never obligated to do anything by the licence he chooses to release with. The licence applied to users of the copyright owners work.

Yeah, I wonder what the intended audience is. I would guess that if someone is familiar with the notation and concepts introduced, that they would also be quite familiar with linear regression. Nice article nevertheless.