HN user
coco1989
What is your point? That being awful is ok? This is a religious thing in this case so a government should not be in the business of protecting one religion or any religious belief - or we should discuss how far to go with it - this ... is too far
you know people will be wearing them till they get sores. They will have scars - the addicts will.
Exactly Kev. Android is like having a phone that feels like it has holes in it and thorns - its like an overgrown backyard like oh I should pull up these weeds.. I should work on this fence.. My iphone is like a smartphone.
My Ipad mini keeps getting slower and slower. soon it will be a Kindle
for more information please reread
"the only thing you’re disrupting out there is your own sense of human decency" Ouch
I know - its like revenge of the show room.. I look for reviews on Amazon and then get it somewhere else..
I found a thing maker in my grandmothers attic - it was awesome.
slashdot - then Digg - then reddit - then hackernews - evolution of getting good interesting stories with smart people commenting about them.
Religion and superstition - there has to be a story that is not true for there to be a True story. Goblins and evlves are not real but ghosts and demons and angels and gods are.
Breitbart? this is not a junk science positive place is it? If I want this I will go to Drudge or just sniff my finger
He looks seriously high..
The amoebas alive today are still here because they are still here and are alive. The great great grandparents we share with the amoebas alive to day are not alive today they have died a long long time ago.
ha
I hate Facebook as well. I have a presence but it is all lies and subterfuge. I also hate Instagram who wants to see pictures.. I used to like Reddit they have a lot better pictures but this site Hacker News is my favorite because of the words. Also Facebook is all exgirlfriends all the time and who needs that.
this is like Yahoo when it was on the buffalo server
There is no reason for a "computer" to do all that and if it could it would not - all that he talked about is about dealing with the limitations of our brains - our mind the machine would not care because it would not care about its limits - we are as a computer one big limited system constrained by the process that brought us into being - chance and natural selection. An ai is not constrained by this anymore than a dog is constrained from finding the same thing funny. humor is not a problem for us because we are part of the problem - we are a constantly derived huge word puzzle. an AI would not be that - AI would have a purpose.