HN user

cobweb1

7 karma
Posts0
Comments12
View on HN
No posts found.

Eh screw it, here's a fourth reply:

The initial population of slaves imported in to the US have now a hundred folded. That's how well blacks have done in America. In Jamaica? There's 3 times as many blacks in Jamaica as were imported as slaves. x3 growth vs x100 growth? Who did it better?

It's too bad the government doesn't collect taxes paid by race, isn't it? Because every year US blacks cost the American government 400 billion dollars, so if you're wondering how badly blacks are being taken care of, well they're 'only' being given a net 400 billion a year. And that's only one minority. Why don't you make a youtube video where you show that to scale, in US cash.

I can do this for days. Are you ready for a complete rewrite of your nervous system? Fool.

Last reply (#3):

Most of it was opinion, some of it was relating history as we know it. Just about everything you posted is incorrect, outright misleading and much of it sourced or the lies initially came from slavery apologists and those that refuse to actually look at history and accept that with the good a lot of bad also happened.

Just about everything you post is incorrect and everything you stand for is vile. You represent a wall to scientists and those that want to speak freely. You seek destruction of everything that is nuanced. You want history to be a fairy tale fit for a night's reading to a child. You drown out the intellectual stimulating world with vile, processed shit. There's children standing on tables, chin deep in your vile shit, screaming at the top of their lungs for help while you raise the shit levels ever more till there's no more children, just shit-filled barely functioning organisms. You refuse to accept that just because bad things happen doesn't mean they always happen in the worst hollywood action filled manner that your subpar mind demands so that it is capable of keeping up. You can drown yourself in shit, I'm not going with you. Bye bye.

Asians are more impacted than this than Caucasians.

Everyone knows that.

Claiming its 'raw ability' is also completely false, its developed education and largely based on socio-economics not race.

Oh so now you're saying asians aren't more impacted. Why are you saying that? You can't even stay coherent within a paragraph. Your worldview doesn't have an ounce of consistency to it.

As a white man born into this world, you haven't earned anything any other person just born into this world doesn't have. Just because some white people have accomplished something doesn't give you claim or credit for that.

Just because some white people have accomplished things doesn't mean he deserves any credit for any of it.

Careful now. You are free to have your own political ideas but leave some space for biology to do its thing. Right now you're rejecting an organisms right to protect itself against parasites and you're veering into an ideology that takes children away from their parents at birth. This is getting "hilariously stupid", as you so aptly put it.

Alright, I'll give the child a sample of what real information and truth looks like:

In 1870: 20.1% of US blacks could read and write 80% of US whites 15% of people in russia

In Robert Evans Jr paper “The Economics of American Negro Slavery", he calculated that blacks got 80-90% of what they produced, after expenses, on average.

While blacks are today the same height if not slightly shorter than whites, during the slavery era they were taller than all whites except for Swedes and English aristocrats.

Throw your "history" books away, child.

By 1880 and until 1940: 70% of black families had both parents co-residing. In 2011 37% of blacks lived in two-parent households, while 75% of whites did. That's a regression from slavery years, genius.

Your homework is to find work by recent geniuses contemplating how the US would have developed differently had slavery never come to America. I also encourage to entirely drop this "exploitation of minorities" nonsense. It is not a factor in explaining the success of rich people, nor is it a factor in explaining country differences. Grow up.

This is false. its a mass media talking point that's wrong. Look into the studies.

Lol. My entire world view is formed by recent studies and other work done by outlier geniuses. I don't listen to mellow versions of history, or to mass media talking points. Not a single bit of what I'm posting has any amount of BS to it. Your world view and character is utterly corrupt and your views entirely based on wishful thinking. It is not based on truths. It does not sound nice to you that we treated slaves well, or that whites did not benefit from slavery, and so those facts become untrue. Your worldview is a children's tale for the diverse classroom. What about information that does not fit into the fairy tale? Oh it's just BS from slavery apologists.

Immigration restrictions are a new thing in the last hundred years or so, people of all kinds immigrated here.

People of all kinds didn't immigrate to America. Europeans of different kinds immigrated here and you can guess a town's ancestry based on how well they take care of their lawns. That's how important their ancestry still is today.

Those "productive" people you refer to largely had their success built on abusing and using the minorities that did immigrate here as well.

I'm throwing this genius quote right back at you: "This is false. its a mass media talking point that's wrong. Look into the studies."

History books have nothing backing your world view here

Lol. Wrong field buddy. Look into recent (like yesterday's) work in the field of intelligence research. Keep up, would you? I don't care about your book of fairy tales.

If measuring something like the visual reaction time of people makes sense, then so too does measuring IQ. Nobody is claiming that the Inuits ability to see far away objects in intense glistening brightness of their snowy lands doesn't constitute real intelligence just because it isn't measured on IQ tests.

Your response is pretty disturbing on many levels I have to say

Well then I guess I will have to worry about the very real loss of genius in shame and silence.

Are they uniquely free riders or just joining the rest in their free riding? The majority of people are not net tax contributors. There's a fascinating gender difference as well, with only men as a group being net tax contributors.

Being shackled to the mediocre majority is never fun, some feel the shackles more than others.

I was under the impression that Jews commonly don't think of themselves as being white whereas the rest of the 'white' groups did. Maybe I'm wrong? Jewishness is a more closely knit identity which Jews are lucky enough to have, whereas even whiteness is an ever expanding identity leaving many white people with nothing but 'American'.

Immigrants are absolutely not treated better than I am anywhere in North America, or in Europe where I've been to date but I'll concede in places where white people are a minority that might not always be true.

Again, isn't the consensus that the percentage of white students in elite colleges would go up from something like 66% to 75% if only raw ability were considered? In other words you're getting shafted for being white, in a mostly white country.

Just because some white people have accomplished something doesn't give you claim or credit for that.

Aren't you gaslighting him? It's called kin selection and it doesn't stop at the parents, it expands outwards further and further with no magical border.

As a white man, you lost me completely there.

I'm not the OP but you've lost me as well. What part of what you're saying is supported by data? Any data?

In fact, you are reviling (immigration, foreigners) the very thing that gave rise to the west as it is now.

What gave rise to the USA were productive people creating a country for themselves and preventing other people from immigrating there. Immigration was mostly limited to other anglos.

One of the most remarkable things happened in Africa, I forget exactly where, where an unbelievably high number of 160IQ+, 170IQ+ school children were found whose parents had immigrated from Britain.

What you had in the USA were a high concentration of these outlier geniuses and other very productive people that made a new nation for themselves.

The history of the white man is filled with taking ideas and solutions from other cultures and races they encounter and building on them, essentially the same thing you're accusing China of doing unfairly.

Is this not a ridiculous statement? The history of the "white man" is filled with producing outlier geniuses that are costly to those around them but benefit the group. These geniuses go their own way, they don't take ideas from others. You don't see these kinds of geniuses elsewhere, for reasons I forget.

Slavery, abuse, theft and centuries of using and discarding anything and anyone we can to get ahead is a significant part of our history

I'm fairly certain that the consensus among those that have looked into slavery in the USA is that it was nothing but detrimental, slowing down progress. The slaves were well fed and made to work little. Children have been made to replicate the daily work of a slave in the USA and have done it with no issue.

It shouldn't come as a surprise to you to learn that the very people that ended slavery are the same people that treated their slaves well.

The slaves that freed themselves before slavery ended integrated surprisingly well, much better than the rest that gained their freedom later. Maybe an IQ difference between those capable of setting themselves free and those not.

Immigrants, especially second and third generation immigrants often have stronger ties to the country the immigrated to and are more willing to fight for it and die for it as numerous studies ahve shown.

It's a recognized problem in Europe that second and third generation immigrants from the middle eastern countries are integrating worse than their parents.

I don't know man, everything you're saying just seems made up from the spot.