HN user
I have no interest in US politics, but I do have an interest in avoiding censorship/bias for topics that I do care about.
The recent events that Glenn Greenwald has reported on has accelerated my move off platforms that have censored, or that can censor.
I won't be able to avoid all of them all of the time, but I can make the alternatives my default.
Federated over centralised. Open over closed. Public domain over ToS.
Headlines often aren't meant to be read literally.
It's just a teaser to read the article.
Governments are responsible for setting safety standards, and enforcing that they do.
That's a fair critique.
I expect the designers foresaw this.
I don't think wide popularity was a goal.
HTTP supports extensibility via HTTP headers and methods.
Gemini to not be evolved:
* HTTP is now for interactivity, complex clients, WebGL, Webassembly, ...
* Gemini is for a segregated simpler web: links and text.
To clarify, I don't use Headscale either.
Both look like great products, I just don't need what they're offering enough to accept their downsides.
Not sure what I think about this.
I don't use Tailscale because I don't trust their key distribution, and this open source project would solve that, but it might undermine Tailscale's sustainability.
This would be a shame because Tailscale is working well with the open source community: open source clients, working well with distros, working well with Linux DNS stack, supporting a more P2P secure Internet, and documenting their well through it.
I've been using GNOME 40 for the past few months, and I'm impressed with the level of quality: intuitiveness, polish, features.
This software works well on my Pinephone too.
I'm happy to trade my flexibility to allow the GNOME the flexibility to make improvements that benefit all.
I understand some want more flexibility, however.
Use nitter, a plain Twitter frontend.
Pick a close instance from https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/wiki/Instances
I have installed https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/nitter-redire...
Note that different people have different criteria for a coup.
For example, in the US in Jan 2021, there was a riot that some call a coup, and some do not.
Brazil might also count. I am not aware of the details.
The comment I replied to was asking for a citation on ACLU expousing authoritarian causes, which I did.
I fail to see how a US Supreme Court ruling is relevant to this.
A recent example: https://greenwald.substack.com/p/the-aclu-prior-to-covid-den...
Please keep discussion polite.
GP did not mention vaccines.
Different people are impacted by lockdown in different ways. Consider those that might have different experiences to yours.
I think it's for fear of appeal to genetics, which has historically been used to justify violations of human rights.