HN user

cha5m

64 karma
Posts0
Comments34
View on HN
No posts found.

This is the definition of a gimmick. How is this superior to the various existing bluetooth-based solutions. Need to navigate without looking at a screen? Bluetooth headphones or a bluetooth connection to your car. Need to skip a track when listening to music? Bluetooth headphones or a bluetooth connection to.... Need to "handle a call"? Bluetooth head-

Stuff like this often makes me question using any DRM or platform-locked services, particularly steam. If valve decided to make a shady decision there is very little that its users could do about it.

Isn't this already how much documentation is structured implicitly?

For example if you have a technical article which references some concept there will likely be a link to another article which explains that concept.

Thus each page already acts as a node connected to other nodes by the links within it. No need for a more formalized graph.

I hate the pedantry that surrounds the word random. Language is defined by those who use it, and clearly by a random person he meant "someone that the parent do not know"

Which is a real concern, and probably is contributing to the downfall of this company, because their market consists entirely of well-off, but also really apathetic parents, which is a niche market if I have ever seen one.

An experiment? Hardly. At least certainly not any more.

They use data to deliver their cancerous content, just in the same way coke uses AB flavor testing to determine what the most addictive coke formula is.

Calling them "scientists" performing "experiments" seems far too dignified.

Serious props to you for making a web browser. That is legitimately impressive.

However I feel like most people won't be willing to sacrifice the feature support, stability and security that a larger browser can provide for a potentially better experience.

If this was made by a single person you should really do a write up about the development process. I think many people would also be interested in that.

I mean medium no worse than any other blogging platform. Who cares if there is crap content on there? The internet is a sea of crap. You just use your brain when reading to see if something sounds like bullshit, and take everything you read with a grain of salt, just like you would anywhere on the internet.

It's not like many people actually browse medium.com, we all just get linked there from HN and reddit, which could happen on any platform. Any crap is really the fault of a the community linking to it.

And in my honest opinion, I haven't really seen that many genuinely awful posts to medium. Perhaps some of you could link to some of the terrible posts this guy is referencing?

But that isn't manipulable by someone standing in line, so it is effectively random. You can't determine exactly when the tsa person will press the button.

Fair enough. I imagine that the paperwork and app verification is where most of the cost was generated.

Sometimes bureaucratic inefficiency just really gets under my skin.

Yeah clearly this ui http://elliott.org/wp-content/uploads/IMG_6317.jpg required 10 days to design.

Why would this require more than a few days? Simple UI, then just generate a secure random number and draw an arrow. Bam. Give me 200k.

I mean the largest expense would almost certainly be third-party pen testing and QA. And why would it take a technical writer 5 days to document this? It has 1 function.