cayde

Yes, but its quite unfortunate in that you cannot do what you want with the data you pay for. Even in plan which not unlimited when I buy in visiting USA, I cannot even use the x GB I purchase without restriction.

I should not need to resorting TTL „unsupported hacks“ which also say company will ban me for.

People do this tell me asshole vibes, similar in ones buy github stars off click farms/hacked accounts and spam their "project" on reddit, IH, [...]

Not everything has to be a hustle, not everything has to background data collection. People dont like it especially in tech oriented!!

there is difference in ,,growth hacker'' vs hacker for sake of learning and build thing you like))

You can show me what you make and I think its cool without having it be screaming billboard in my face try to suck up in all data as it can! ~ Not everything needs to be a transaction

Tethering is idiot expensive in USA. Every provider will DPI and block it or throttle it. It's awful.

I do not mind as much using my own mobile if it is a TOTP standard that I do not need to install spyware for. I have already TOTP apps that I can add QR and it's not costly or difficult.

Any kind of third party internet required app? Do I required Microsoft Authenticator or Duo - always on push access, internet required, logs my phone's IP and location? They must pay for the device and the plan. If you want me enter MDM, Outlook, ActiveSync? They must pay for the device and the plan.

To use legacy UX you can put in the watch. https://youtube.com/shorts/91Rmacvw4ho to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91Rmacvw4ho

ACH takes days to weeks to clear anyway, especially if new sender or large amounts = untrusted. There is no real exception handling so you are given the amount on credit.

https://engineering.gusto.com/how-ach-works-a-developer-pers...

(From parent) > And the payee doesn’t need to share their bank info.

And this is a US concept where having the magic numbers lets you pull any amount you want, with no ability to have a "push only" number...

If you want to hop into a rabbit hole, try taking look in Steam's login send the user and pass))

If TLS break then all is untrusted anyway! If you read hash as MITM you can replay it as pass equivalent and log in with hash, do not need knowledge of the original pass. You can just inject the script to exfilatrate original pass before hashing. CSP is broken, since you can edit header to give your own script a inline nonce. I think everything is reliant on TLS in end.

I think 10yr ago before TLS was 99%+ standard on all sites many people would come up with schemes, forums would md5 pass client side and send md5, all sorts were common. But now trust is in TLS.

No, usually it's sent in plain text to the server, however encapsulated.

I donet believe they control the Vercel endpoint "B"