caresource_ta

This is very interesting. This might just replace the raspberry pi connected to my VT220, I could even use a Bluetooth serial transceiver and make the whole thing wireless.

That's now how this works, that's not how any of this works. If you have ever been cold called by Google I would go change your passwords and the like.

I can't provide a specific answer but the whole field of Engineered Lumber works on these problems.

Prefabrication requires a higher level of design maturity as opposed to traditional construction and from my anecdotal experience this can provide a significant increase in speed itself.

I did a quick search to determine if cities built from wooden structures can act as carbon sinks and I came across this great overview of the carbon footprint of wood buildings[0]. Granted it was created by a special interest group.

0- PDF http://www.awc.org/pdf/education/gb/ReThinkMag-GB500A-Evalua...

The original title was something to the effect of "YouTube now using CPU draining cryptocurrency miner in ads."

This doesn't seem like the case but Cathy O'Neil (the author of Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy) raises the point that we often see algorithms implemented in non-traditional ways when society faces tough questions. It makes me really hesitant about using algorithms as silver bullets to solve hard problems in society.

This tittle is misleading, maybe something like "Attackers abuse ad platform to serve cryptocurreny mining ads on YouTube".

Why would this article be funded by Qatar? Because it's the same narrative that has existed and been written about for months or because the component facts can be independently researched and verified.

Subsidizing users is one side of the coin. The other side is that Uber has been living beyond their means and they do not have the cash to keep doing this.

That line of thinking in regards to bomb threats is dangerously wrong. Politically motivated bombers often make warning calls to spare innocent people. Today it may seem legitimate bomb threats are rare but this was certainly not the case in the late 60's and early 70's in the US.

From the memoirs of Richard Nixon. "From January 1969 through April 1970 there were, by conservative count over 40,000 bombings, attempted bombings and bombs threats-an average of over eighty a day. Over $21 million in property was destroyed. Forty-three people were killed. Of those 40,000 incident, 64 percent were by bombers whose identity and motive were unknown."

Insurance does not replace value, insurance is fundamentally and always a value transfer vehicle. Although in some implementations insurance can act as a value replacement mechanism this is the result of the implementation and not a fundamental property of insurance. You seem to base your understanding of insurance on some common implementations that do replace value but these are not the rule for all insurance.

Can confirm it works fairly well for the poor. I have been registered for Medicaid the past three years of school and have not had to used it until this year. Every single time I use my insurance (CareSource) I am absolutely blown away by how painless it is. Other than presenting proof of coverage twice in a series of multiple hospital and doctor's visits I have not had to worry about insurance for a single moment. At one point my physician was ordering lab work and kept asking if I wanted any additional lab work of my choosing and this just seemed absurd because on private insurance I would never consider lab work to be discretionary.