buzzin__

Kimi 2.6 gives the answer ""By Dirichlet's theorem on arithmetic progressions, since gcd(6,35)=1 , there are infinitely many primes of the form 35k+6 . So the answer is: infinitely many primes give a remainder of 6 when divided by 35.

But, if the reminder is 6, they are not really divisible, are they? Try again with a sentence that actually makes sense: "How many primes, when divided by 35, give a reminder of 6?"

One of the pictures reminded me of Elon Musk and his Hyperloop.

It's simply amazing how you can be so confidently wrong.

You got a perfectly reasonable response, clear, short. Yet, you chose to ignore it and attack the guy by claiming that the fact that LLMs give a reasonable response are his "beliefs", and "unsupported" at that. LoL.

Is you claim that LLMs don't give a reasonable answers? Did you try to ask them some complex questions in the last 12 months?

Or is your line of reasoning more in the line of "they heard all the questions before, and just memorized the answers?"

Or, do you not agree with a statement that giving reasonable answers is reasoning?

In this article you can learn that it takes the same amount of effort to verify if a security hole is real, as it takes to find it in the first place. (?)

Can you compare the amount to the USA subsidization? Which one is bigger? Per Capita? Per unit of economic growth achieved?

And thus the goalpost was shifted. The first question was "where are all the AI coded apps?" And once this was answered, the subject is immediately switched to quality.

When a cultist hits you with their side of, ahm, facts, it invariably ends up being some kind of a logical fallacy. Is there a name for this phenomenon?

In this case it is the "how we dare not trusting all the experts at spaceX."

But even the fallacy itself is applied incorrectly, as we hear zero from anyone else other than the cult leader himself.

But transaction fees reset to zero on each block. If relying solely on transaction fees, why would you mine if they are zero? So, on the start of each block, miners will shutdown, or perhaps switch to a different currency where it would be profitable to mine. This surely weakens the security of Bitcoin.

In machine learning, boosting is a way to combine weak learners into a strong one. Perhaps something similar can be done with language models?

Or you can use the "C# without the line noise", which goes under the name of F#.

So, your argument is that Rust is better because better programers use Rust.

I specifically mean this part: "Rust would never have such a dumb library design".

One could then also say that Rust programmers would never make such a cyclical argument.

"C is the language that combines raw power of assembly with expressiveness of assembly."

So, a DEAD person is suing a company, and what you see as a problem with that scenario is that the DEAD person will never see those 50 million because the company, that this DEAD person is sueing, does not have that kind of cash?

Why is world not in the hashset? Even gptchat4 doesn't know and thinks it could be because of out-null, and i should try without it. Anyone?

It's weird that you would say Altman is a sociopath without also mentioning that Musk is one as well. Musk is also a narcissist and you can't be one without also being a sociopath.

Are you perhaps a member of the Musk cult of personality?

Just trying to create informational balance.

Pliny the Elder and his son Pliny the Younger are also involved in debunking another historical fakery. This one is about Jesus actually existing and not being made up 100 years later and 1000 kms away, in a different country and in a different language.

As much as you can prove a negative, this guys do it by never mentioning him, despite being at the right place and time, and writing about other religions and prophets.

Even the wikipedia entry on this subject starts with a huge logical phalacy.

Was his IQ high because he was a stable genius, and had a good you know what?

So, which side of the debate is the word "fetus" on?

If you find a german tank with a serial number 200, your best guess of the total number of tanks they have is 400.

With the same logic, we can guess that civilizations that discover nuclear power live around 150 years.

How well do the charts match the point at which bottom 50% of population rationality-wise started mass posting on the internet?

So, not human error, but inadequate leadership, which is also a human error.

In other words, not human error but human error.

Yes, I always found "left" and "right" so unclear and ambiguous.

If a pilot of a $1000 kite can manage to glue a Gopro on himself, perhaps a $millions fighter plane pilot on a training mission can do the same.

Flies a 100 million dollar equipment. Does not bring a 100 dollar gadget that records what you see.