buhhh

lmao

Projection is a great tactic, isn't it?

I'm aware.

Well the first amendment isn't Article 19 of the UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Not sure where you're going with that.

.

I'm not here to educate you.

I don't think you understand the first amendment.

Are you confusing harm with death rates? It's a novel virus and we still do not know the long term health impacts of it.

Private company. I don't care. Jumping from Microsoft doing a thing about this to a law being passed restricting speech is quite the stretch and would be against the 1st.

asymptomatic =/= free of harm caused by the virus

Sorry, what is CFS?

edit: thanks!

The obsession with total cases is maddening. First, they are driven significantly by amount of testing.

I think more significantly they're driven by total cases. Are you suggesting we test less?

Also you seem to have a very black and white view of outcomes. It's not clear cut between alive or dead. There's many things that we still don't know about this virus and the harm it causes. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20200622-the-long-term-ef...

That's great and all but did you also consider your impact on others? Also, I sincerely doubt you were able to get an accurate picture of risk in February.