budsniffer952

What do you know, you can get someone to support any message or arguments you want.

Lesson in there about experts and politics.

Yes, because we had the same stupid arguments then: "that's not AI!"

So machine learning became the marketing.

You're just making up your own definitions. Have at it, but as you've been told: this stuff is not new.

You do realize there's another side to it, right? There are morally good examples where privacy is needed, and morally bad examples where not being able to access data is harmful.

I personally agree with you, but for most people it's not black or white. They want privacy when it suits them, but would take yours away in a heartbeat.

"I don't know who any of these people are, or what the theory is, but it's obviously wrong."

- Classic HN commentor

There is no should or should not.

Look at the financials and the price, and you as an individual get to determine if it's worth buying (or selling).

Addiction, fame, loss, he was early on the anti-woke stuff, which became a major cultural flashpoint, money.

Believe it or not, he was a pretty good academic at one point.

What does neurodivergent mean? If there's a spectrum, what is considered normal, and how is that measured?

I had a 2014 Fiesta ST and it was an amazing little car. Obviously quick, but could also get close to 50mpg cruising at highways speeds.

There is more to performance than 0-60. But Elon told normies that's what matters, now suddenly everyone quotes those times like gospel.

Nope, I draw my line at Notepad!

That's fast food thinking

You're simply drawing the line where it suits you.

I don't consider it pure human coding if you use anything but Notepad.

This is the classic gatekeeping our industry loves:

"This guy couldn't do a thing we found easy, now he can! Boooo!"

Yes, I can now set up a Drupal website in a few hours. That is great for me.

We have people here who use LLMs to raise their children, to manage relationships, to design products

It's not either/or. I think about designing a product in conjunction with AI "thinking" about it. Two heads are better than one.

There is so much daylight between "completely abstain" and making better choices, even if those choices are painful. I can assure you the author uses an expensive phone, and shops at the same clothing stores we do. By shear coincidence, the thing he doesn't want to use is the easy choice.

80% of anything I read online is hating on AI, what are you people even talking about?

Smartest thing this article says: dont like it? Don't use it. Done.

The food we eat, clothes we wear, and every electronic device we touch may embody innumerable injuries to the world, and all this is inescapable

Classic. "All the things I don't want to give up... inescapable. But this thing over here I don't like? Yeah, you should give it up."

I'll give up AI when you give up your phone.

That's a strange definition of "subsidy".

Bluntly China’s government is corrupt and inefficient (usa is even further behind china since their current government is also corrupt and inefficient).

So countries are only behind Australia because of corruption? And the US is only behind because of Trump, specifically?

Man, must be nice to have such a basic view of the world; everything so sinpmy explained.

Don't forget to mention how modest and humble you are.

Remember when the "crazy far right" went on and on about pedophile conspiracies and the left laughed at them? Good times.

Each citizen doesn't need to, only some citizens need be able to. Because the data is available.

Not sure about you, but I'm glad we moved away from a system where an anointed cadre of people tell us what's what.

You can rest assured Trump is going to preemptively pardon everyone associated with him. On an ungodly scale.

And why wouldn't he? Biden preemptively pardoned his family, which was unprecedented, and Democrats said it was fine.

This is now the world we live in, and why these precedents are bad.

One man's opinion, and not surprising or controversial, is it?

There's an insatiable demand for capital right now, so funding will get more competitive.

Kinda like how the Bun team spent years building their product then this guy trashes it? Except for real?

And he didn't "expose" anything but gossip.

Call a spade a spade, the rewrite was poorly justified

In what world do you think they have to justify a rewrite to anyone outside their company? Bizarre mentality.

The article wasn't very long and had little of substance besides these personal attacks. So...no.

talked about what they didn't like with how Jarred acted and worked

Gossip and hearsay; the "grapevine".

Besides, what does it matter how a language user does business?

except it's not

Except it is. The people using it told us.

Jarred has written Bun with very bad engineering standards

"You're holding it wrong."

Jarred has managed public relations very poorly (e.g. ghosting the Zig foundation)

What obligation do you think he has here? Which direction should these good relations flow?

I'm also an outsider here, and reading this post was kind of shocking. Can't believe someone would attack your open source code. It's everything normies hate about ornery IT people.