The original contract very specifically allows consignment. It's published.
So you "absolutely believe" something that was already proven false, and which you would know if you had even _skimmed_ the facts.
HN user
The original contract very specifically allows consignment. It's published.
So you "absolutely believe" something that was already proven false, and which you would know if you had even _skimmed_ the facts.
By this logic, nothing is theft, and everything is just a civil contract dispute.
There is no need for us to accept your sociopathic assertion that the rich should and will win.
Candidly, I'd argue that it doesn't.
It has a style that allows people to _pretend_ they're having substantive conversation, but it's mostly just people blathering in a distinct style without ever listening.
Probably because I am.
But it doesn't matter. Another thing that's worse about HN is that you can now accuse anybody who posts things you dislike of being a bot.
It's unsurprising that Sean, who posts several times a day, is eager to dismiss my criticism of non-value-addding posting addicts.
I don't even know my old account's password.