HN user
we have that already, the layer is called "money" you can give people rides and be compensated in the "money points (usually US dollar). Later you can use this points to recieve rides yourself by others. great thing is that you can use those points for many goods and services and not only for rides.
their stockprice would make a big jump if they could manage to lay off 110k people.
I think it would be a good thing, to streamline their operation.
why is it that Amazon cant just put a much higher bounty on that task? of lets say 1m$? it seems that this would increase the competition by a huge amount and if that can get amazon 1 year closer to fully automated picker it should be wort it.
The payed around 700m$ for the kiva bots, so why one 30k$ for that competition?
Or dont they beliefe in markets?
so ordering in the rushhour times is the xpert play here then.
Can somebody explain me why a democracy allows for donations at all? Donations will clearly skew the political landscape towards the people who have money to donate. And those people are more likely to donate with an expected value. So they will try to skew the politics in their favour.
Why would it be bad to forbid any kind of political donation for established parties. I see the need to fund a grow new parties, but established parties should get by with the money they receive from the government.