bohoo

Either you used AI or you happen to write like an AI - in either case something to work on.

I do think my comment was lazily dismissive so you do have a point but in so far your post is basically just a gripe, I would think artful expression of said gripe is basically the only thing that makes it worthwhile. Phrases like the kind you only get from watching a decision go sideways in a boardroom stink of llm, are not artful and have extra irony riding along given the point you are making.

edit: No scratch that, artfulness is not necessary - just get better at screening out the flavour of AI, even if you find it useful to write with - because people will notice.

You clearly used AI pretty heavily to write this - so whats the point?

This reads like AI most of the time - you must spend more time writing yourself

Oh this is fantastic actually - and I was expecting slop - very well done.

Hacker culture sees programming as a conversation with a machine as it runs.

That sounds like relating to me- but who wouldn't think of a hacker as a paradigm maker. So perhaps hacker straddles the two: both making and relating?

I think "poetry" is a protected term - so personally I don't this thing generates poetry.

Who does the author refer to with 'anonymous stochastic ringleader'?

I like the turn of phrase and understand it may be more of a poetic throwaway but I remain a bit uncertain as to what they had in mind.

What does the author mean by 'anonymous stochastic ringleader'