HN user

bodi

-5 karma
Posts0
Comments37
View on HN
No posts found.

I like patterns too. For example have you ever noticed China artificially props up the US economy via bonds/debt/investment and in return has flagrantly been allowed to steal pretty much every byte of US IP, both from the private sector and defense with zero pushback from our "intelligence" community, legislature, and only a hand wavey stop it from the Obama admin?

You still like patterns?

Most of the bloat is covering bad or outdated architecture.

Imagine starting from scratch with Genode or what Google is doing with their new (3rd) OS.

I've only recently been evaluating FoundationDB for an upcoming project and have not yet gotten into the video roundup, so please forgive..

Is anyone using FoundationDB as a graphdb akin to Neo4j?

It seems to me Document Layers could be used to create virtual property edges from the underlying KV store?

Any thoughts/plans on how Foundation could be used as a graph in general?

Thanks!

I have a very healthy love for physics, and am simply attempting to draw your awareness to the complete subjectivity and awe of the universe.

To reallocate the code metaphor, at some point you step back from the monitor and realize you are certainly discovering how Photoshop was written while completely ignoring the images it creates, documenting the MP3 format, but ignoring the music, describing how the tree grows, while missing the forest.

<3

You self scoped the question as “universe” and any field, subjective or absolute, where 3/4 of your hard problem stuff is unidentified, probably disqualifies you as a generalist expert so I think physics are the furthest from tautology as the universe and our existence can get.

It would be like a coder saying his codebase is 3/4 missing, let alone the runtime, OS, processor, being completely speculative, but then claiming to be an expert matter on computing.

No, you might very well be a micro expert relative to other micro experts in your small corner of your codebase, but on the universe of existence at large?

Perhaps some respect and humility to the whole process are due. ;)

But if you want to understand the universe then physicists are the people you'll want to listen to...

Bold claim. I would like to ask physicists what chicken tastes like? Or why the mountains are beautiful? Or where the other 73% of our existence is?

conspiracy theory

Its a fact and works exactly as he described.

Also the term conspiracy theory was created and popularized by the CIA as a function to install into the general population as a protection mechanism against their own true and active operations, which as stated, are treasonous to America and American citizens.

A useful tool for you might be to become self aware of your use of the term “conspiracy theory” and whenever you find yourself reaching for it as a knife, to instead reflect on the issue and to genuinely and independently compile a response to the topic at hand using basic logic, reason, and available known prior actions of the organizations that would profit from discrediting the topic.

Good luck.

Much of the ancient esoteric wisdom taught that we were all of one, a mind, a singularity if you will.

I think this bit of truth was purposely hidden, as Einstein himself alluded to, by a dark cabal, and has coincidentally been rediscovered albeit as a secular institution primarily through a diefication of the scientific process.

Some of our still very early study of Quantum Mechanics points right to this matrix reality we experience.

However uncomfortable that may be.

One of the most beautiful and simultaneously terroristic traits of our existence is that of binary computational equivalence.

Of course, binary as a notion is simply a set of relative measurements of the peaks and troughs of a wave at a specific time and scale, therefore we may deduce the ultimate excitation of all, what appears as this large number, is an analog, encompasses everything, and our reality a carefully crafted series of reductions from this source.

Wonderful and awe inspiringly scary that we may even consider such a thing of brilliance.

sort of divide and conquer

Your assertion is not strong enough and your self referential call out to authority is suspect or at the least misplaced.

It is absolutely divide and conquer and it absolutely is an organized effort.

My assertions were posed as questions only to guide the light.

Anyone with eyes to see will know this. The problem is most of those eyes lack the courage and faith to speak.