blubbar

When I say that we don't need more children and should people not encourage to get more children because we already have enough humans I get the weirds looks. If i tell them that japan has many problems, but their shrinking population is not nobody believes me. They ask "What about their social security?" (I'm European) Well, it's just a ponzi scheme it will collapse anyway. First of all people should stop thinking more people = better. If we cut all our propaganda and financial aid for more children the children per women would probably drop well below one child per woman. That would be a way to start.

Sounds fun. But why is it limited to js?

No, that's just the signal "That's beyond my scope", a sign of professionalism. If you try to be hobby cop and judge you will fail. That's a job for the pros.

>Past behavior is an indicator of present/future behavior.

But a pretty bad one. I wouldn't mind if a murderer would give talk (if it was good). And not about the murdering, but about let's say ReiserFS.

>why wouldn't you trust their reports?

Well, just imagine there was some emacs guy who routinely went around harassing people who used vim. He was offensive and yet they gave back words and didn't leave as he wanted. So he reported them on the next best thing that would get them baned.

And the other way round: If the grid was large enough we would not need storage. It seems reasonable to try to improve both the grid and storage.

http://www.unendlich-viel-energie.de/uploads/media/AEE_Strom...

This is in German, but the only source i could find. It says PV produced 3% of the procuced energy in 2011. It is said the capacity grew about 30% since q4 2011, but the stats seem to be pending.

[BS]

In 2010 604,0 TWh where consumed [1], so that would be 604,0 TWh * 3% / 8760 h = 2 GW as a conservative estimate. But note the stats are all a bit out of date.

[1] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bedarf_an_elektrischer_Energie...

[/BS]

As the graph says 612 TWh where produced, so 612 TWh * 0.03 / 8760h = 2 GW.

>€100 billion [2] to build this, at taxpayer expense.

At energy consumers expense to be precise. 100 billion € sound scary, but it's just adds another 8,2% to the incredibly expensive German electricity bill.

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strompreis

But nuclear plants burn fuel at night when nobody needs the energy. Pumped-storage hydroelectricity is needed for both.

This is extremely stupid. would it be mongodb.js? or mongodb.c++ mongodb.oss mongodb.foss mongodb.nosql or mongodb.webtwozeroishstuff ? We don't need more fragmentation.

I guess the next thing they want after .biz is .cool .startup .awesome and .hip . This is not how TLDs (should) work!