HN user
Remember that every company, like every interviewer, is trying to put their best foot forward during the interview process.
You can never expect them to be on any better behavior, so expect this as your top bar for your relationship and you'll not have many surprises.
As a corollary, that means anything that looks like a red flag is probably an iceberg.
If you turn your head sideways and squint a little it looks a little like functional react using SQL syntax to replace JSX
The only thing I really miss in the default Ruby hash is property access for keys like JavaScript has.
I know, I know, OStruct does this but it's not the thing that gets built from hash literals so it's less convenient.
It's a minor quibble
Reminds me of Cursor. What do you feel are your important differentiators from them?
Set smaller goals. You learn more from finishing. Pick something you can almost do, cut it to one feature, and commit to it. Learn only enough to finish that one feature.
Copy from somewhere else something that is close to what you want and modify it.
You can do it. Start embarrassingly small and stack tiny successes on each other to the moon
Can't tell if you're missing the point on purpose or just did no research, maybe due to the lack of evidence you cite