HN user

bjohnson225

286 karma

Software Engineer

Posts0
Comments96
View on HN
No posts found.

The European Data Centre Assocation is expecting the highest growth rate in Europe to be in Milan and Madrid.

"The selection of tier-2 metropolitan areas shows that overall, they are growing faster than market average. Madrid and Milan are clearly taking the lead and are both able to attract the biggest additional investments. It can safely be said that they are on their way to becoming additional tier-1 locations."

https://www.eudca.org/documents/content/ZlZXb4bRSRefaEVqya2I... (downloads a pdf)

Trust in me

No, because being Italian doesn't mean you know anything about this. Most Italians think the primary Italian exports are mozzarella and tomatoes.

Layoffs at Block 5 months ago

whatever AI cost restructuring happening today

Is it actually AI-related cost restructuring, or did they simply hire too many people? They will obviously prefer to tell a story about AI rather than bad management.

How is that relevant? The US can reform its healthcare system whenever it decides to do so.

For the EU, Visa and Mastercard dependence form a duopoly controlled by a hostile foreign power. An alternative is essential.

You can't just learn a few words and expect to follow a train announcement, particularly when it's not obvious from context (anything other than announcing the next station).

This reads like an attempt to pass the blame to others. Per capita CO₂ emissions in the US are one of the highest in the world, and significantly higher than those in China or SEA. This is despite the US/Europe moving some of our dirtiest/cheapest manufacturing to that region.

Personal choices matter. See the amount of energy used on air conditioning in the US compared to areas of Europe with comparable weather for a banal example. If we want to significantly reduce emissions it will happen through a combination of personal choices, corporate action and government policy.

Source?

Looking on Google the closest I can find to your claim is the NTSB chair saying it might not be related after she gave out the details of the previous warning lights (as you'd expect in her position before the investigation has completed).

Not fly the specific aircraft which had three pressurisation warnings in the days prior to incident until they've carried out some checks? They were serious enough that they decided it wasn't safe to fly that plane over water.

Maybe the actions of Alaska Airlines were absolutely fine, but the CEO passing all the blame to Boeing before the incident report is understandable, but a little off to me.

"Alaska Airlines placed restrictions on the Boeing plane involved in a dramatic mid-air blowout after pressurisation warnings in the days before Friday's incident, investigators say."

Boeing absolutely deserve every single bit of the criticism they get for the Max, but it's worth keeping in mind that in this instance Alaska possibly share some of the responsibility for flying an aircraft with known issues.

Source: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-67909417

What will people talk about if Instagram is friendly

Anything that's not the current American culture wars? The same things most people talk about in their lives when not throthing at the mouth on Twitter. (i.e. comedy, sports, tech, food, animals, jobs, cars, etc.)

And, of course, culture wars will still be discussed, but it doesn't need promoting to those not interested in arguing such things on social media.

Trump is also on both Twitter and Threads. As long as he and other Instagram users are on Threads, then the outrage town hall will continue and will be no better than Twitter.

I don't know, I'm in Europe, I follow zero explicitly political people yet US politics dominates my Twitter feed. I don't get that on Instagram which is all I need to make the service more enjoyable and to feel less toxic than Twitter. The outrage town hall will of course continue on Threads, but hopefully with only those who are activley seeking it.

I thought the quotes on the BBC article were quite revealing:

Mr Zuckerberg said keeping the platform "friendly... will ultimately be the key to its success".

But Mr Musk responded: "It is infinitely preferable to be attacked by strangers on Twitter, than indulge in the false happiness of hide-the-pain Instagram."

If Threads is a fractionally less toxic version of Twitter, it’ll do quite well.

This is very different though - it completely covers much of your face and there is no comparable device that is used in public, whereas AirPods are more or less the same design that we’ve seen in earphones for decades only without a cable.

outside of the USA if they piss off Mark Zuckerberg enough they can lose the rest of the world because who would want a phone that doesn't have WhatsApp?

We use WhatsApp by default because of the network effects. FB have no power over Apple here because removing it from iPhones would kill the only reason people use it. The switch to (most likely) Telegram would happen overnight.

Shifting all responsibility to producers is about as helpful as shifting it all to consumers. Clearly there is responsibility on both sides. Burning gas for cooking or heating is bad for emissions, so it is reasonable for people to avoid doing so for longer than necessary. Same goes for producers burning fossil fuels for electricity, etc.

The idea of Twitter as the world's town square always seems odd to me because the level of discourse there is consistently horrible. Twitter is a digital theatre, not a town square.

The alternatives would depend upon what you’re trying to get from the platform, but they would include anything from other social media (for the more fun use cases) to traditional news websites (following political events) to HN/newsletters (tech news) to whatever else. Or just keep using it since the product matters more than the owner.

Surely the redeeming thing about the new design is that it led to 40% higher sales?

By the only metric that matters this design is significantly better than “perfect”.

I'm also not sure why you'd declare functions for each type of pizza; that's data.

Yep, had the same thoughts reading the code. What you suggest even seems a purer implementation of the DRY principle, rather than what is proposed in the article which would result in copy and pasting the make_pepperoni_pizza() function as soon as you decide to sell a third type of pizza.

Of course, the DRY principle used without considering other factors could produce bad results, but all the code in the article is bad for reasons unrelated to the principle it attempts to criticize.

It would be very interesting to see the conversion rates of Bolt and Stripe. Considering we have Apple/Google Pay, Paypal, Klarna, and card details being stored in a browser the advantages offered by Bolt seem minimal at best. It's also hard to imagine moving from a situation where a payment passes through one service (Stripe) to two services (Bolt and Stripe) being particularly cost effective for the merchant.

I also imagine more than a few shoppers would be freaked out by seeing their card details stored on a site they've never used.