HN user
I’ve had ~15 cars over the past 25 years, different make and models, some really cheap, some fairly expensive. One thing they all have in common: their terrible infotainment UI.
I’m sure they are trying and it has gotten slightly better lately - but it’s still not great imho. If they really want to do it better than Apple etc., they seriously need to up their game - and I really wish they would, but I don’t see that happening, the cost is too high.
..and with faster and faster iterations :|
I started studying IT back in ‘99 and got a strict warning from the school my first year, because I had used the schools network to access the internet from my own laptop. I had “gained access” by plugging an ethernet cable into a random socket in the wall, and was doing some homework, when radom employee walked by. Since there wasn’t any rules (yet), that allowed nor disallowed it, I got of with only a warning ... from a school, that teaches IT :|
Just remember: never use Environment= for secrets, since they are visible to all users on the system.
(Use EnvironmentFile= instead)
..laymen..
That’s the behavioral problem.
When AI is assisting a professional, the outcome is vastly different.
The comparison is somewhat skewed, since they went from an (expensive) virtual server to a cheaper dedicated server (hardware).
One of the new risks is if anything critical happens with the hardware, network, switch etc. then everything is down, until someone at Hetzner go fixes it.
With a virtual server it’ll just get started on a different server straight away. Usually hypervisors also has 2 or more network connections etc.
And hopefully they also got some backup setup.
It’s still a huge amount of of savings and I’d probably do the same of I were in their shoes, but there is tradeoffs when going from virtual- to dedicated hardware.
We've setup and used peer-relays since it was first announced and they've been great, but they do solve a somewhat specific problem.
Some of our users experienced fairly limited throughput from time to time. Under certain circumstances (eg. always ipv4 NAT/double-NAT, never for ipv6) their Tailscale client couldn't establish a direct connection to the Tailscale node in the datacenter, so data was relayed through Tailscales public relay nodes. Which at times was rate limited/bottleneck - in all fairness, that is to be expected according to their docs.
The first mitigation was to "ban" the specific public relay they were using in the policy. Which helped, but still not a great solution and we might just end up in a weird whack-a-mole-ish ban game with the public peer relays in the long run.
So we setup a peer relay, which networking-wise is in a DMZ sort of network (more open), but location wise still in the datacenter and allowed it to easily reach the internal (more restricted networking) Tailscale nodes. Which solved all throughput problems, since we no longer have users connecting through the public relays.
Also, the peer relays feels a little bit magic, once you allow the use of them in the Tailscale policy, it just works(tm) - there is basically zero fiddling with them.
EDIT: I'll happily provide more details if interested - we did a fair amount of testing and debugging along the way :)
Or: https://linuxgsm.com/ - 130+ game servers.
CLI only though, but really nice.
Try “UsePAM no” and ensure “UseDNS no” in sshd_config on Ubuntu and you’ll probably experience the same fast login time.
“We care about your privacy..”
Followed by something about 1800+ companies they want to sent my data to .. :|
AI companies scrape to:
- have data to train on
- update the data more or less continuously
- answer queries from users on the fly
With a lot of AI companies, that generates a lot of scraping. Also, some of them behave terribly when scraping or is just bad at it.
It’s been privatized for the past 15 years or so. It’s just change of contractor.
Yeah, I'm already using nftables and I agree that it's better than eg. iptables (or the numerous frontends for iptables) and probably the best bet we have at this point - but honestly, it's still far from the UX I get from pf - unfortunately :/
Coming from FreeBSD and pf, all Linux firewalls I’ve tried feels clunky _at best_ UX-wise.
I’d love a Linux firewall configured with a sane config file and I think BSD really nailed it. It’s easy to configure and still human readable, even for more advanced firewall gateway setups with many interfaces/zones.
A have no doubt that Linux can do all the same stuff feature-wise, but oh god the UX :/
It’s not as much about the risk of failure, as both are safe when the correct safety measures are in place.
But what might happen when they fail - thermal runaway is no joke with lithium-ion, ask any firefighter.
Looks like the C64 is behind it (underneath a..?) and there’s a small corner of 5.25” diskette station further back.
Probably not his daily drivers.. :)
Huh..? MySQL 9 is not even GA in AWS RDS yet, only in preview: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonRDS/latest/UserGuide/MySQL...
And latest 8.0 and 8.4 is supported at least a year from now.
Headscale is the not-vendor-login version of Tailscale.
Why is Github enforcing that decision..
Because at the end of the day, Github is responsible for _their_ runners.
If you want full control, install and use your own runners, which flips the responsibility to you.
From a drawing perspective the hat is fairly simple (3-4 lines), looks good and quick to sketch - speed mattered when drawing lots of Smurf’s.
Huh? I’ve used jellyfin on my chromecast for years
Maybe the taller aspect ratio is due to cockpit surfaces being more horizontal or vertical than eyesight..?
Like letters/words painted on the road for drivers to read them.
Take a look at Crystal for types: https://crystal-lang.org/
Do you know if it says anything about restarting them simultaneously or not?
I would think trying to restart engines one at a time would be preferred, over both of them at the same time - or maybe thats not how it works..?
But then you’ll no longer receive any future security fixes by the publisher.
It’s a hard problem to fix, when we can’t trust any publishers in the future :(
And the shortened form, eg. http://127.1/ (for 127.0.0.1)
They have a really great in-depth blog post describing how they do it: https://tailscale.com/blog/how-nat-traversal-works
Lift sofa upright, so i stands on one of the sides. If you look at it from above (like the animations), it’s now an L-shape (U-shape in the animations) with more space to move it around the corner.
But.. that’s just maintenance?
There is clearly a failure of engineering leadership. I am still puzzled why.
I personally believe it’s lack of good engineering leadership and it’s only getting worse at this point. I’ve experienced a fair share of technical leaders without enough technical background and/or experience - people/leadership skills is equally important imho, but people with both are hard to find (scarce resource) and it seems like it’s often the tech side that gets compromised.
I think one of the reasons is the IT industry is simply growing too fast, meaning we have a very small pool of people with many years of experience and a very large pool of people with less experience (compared to other industries). But we do need technical leaders, hence the compromise (need?) to pick people with less experience. Unfortunately.