HN user

bilalsoidik

1 karma
Posts0
Comments1
View on HN
No posts found.

MAKE VALUE TYPES ​​EASIER TO USE AND EXPLOIT THE TYPE INFERENCE CAPABILITIES Hi! I have some ideas that I think They would be interesting on how to use Values Types. I have two proposal: How to define if? and how to use it? The two are separate proposal. I will write the first proposal.

1.Defining Value Types? A. What about forcing a primary constructor to indicate that it is a value type, there is some thing like it in C#6, but in C# it just to make easy to define a primary constructor. So in Java we can use it differently. So we can say that if we use it that we are defining a value type. It is possible to have more than one explicit constructor. But I don't think that we have to force developer to write a constructor if it is not necessary. Why? According to the document Value-types constructors are really factory methods, so there is no new;dup;init dance in the bytecodes.

So I think that to define a value type we can only do: <p><pre><code> final class Point(int x, int y){

boolean equals(Point p){ return this.x==p.x&&this.y==p.y}

}; </code></pre></p> x and y are automatically final and public members. So that can exactly be compiled like: <p><pre><code> final __ByValue class Point { public final int x; public final int y;

    public Point(int x, int y) { 
        this.x = x;
        this.y = y;
    }

    public boolean equals(Point that) {
        return this.x == that.x && this.y == that.y;
    }
} </code></pre></p> Simple, concise and contributes to productivity. I also I thought about something new. We can also do: <p><pre><code> final class Point(int x, int y){ private int c;//if I wont boolean equals(Point p){ return this.x==p.x&&this.y==p.y} public static Point getFunPoint(){ } public static void maFunction(Point p, boolean b, double b){ } } </code></pre></p> B. Why not an implicit default equals. So if I do : <p><pre><code> final class Point(int x, int y){} </code></pre></p> that means if the JVM doesn't find an explicit equals, it cans do logical compare. <p><pre><code> public boolean equals(Point that) { return this.x == that.x && this.y == that.y; }. </code></pre></p> So a Point can be defined in one line: <p><pre><code> final class Point(int x, int y){} </code></pre></p> C. If we don't want to define something else in a value type, braces can be optional as in lambda expressions :) So to define a value type we can only do: <p><pre><code> final class Point(int x, int y); </code></pre></p>