HN user

bigyellow

-11 karma
Posts0
Comments113
View on HN
No posts found.

Where is that definition from? I couldn't find it in DSM-5.

Also, why is the Census (or any collective action) more important than an individual's subjective view of privacy (or any private thought)?

Guy works at Facecrook for a decade and all he can muster is a selfish article about compensation and his precious "work life balance". Couldn't even say a few words about the ethical ramifications of this "contributions" to society by working there. No soul, no mindfulness, just pure ego.

So there's no incentive for hospitals to over-count COVID cases, no federal money involved with inflated numbers, and no political motivation to artificially create a disaster? How nice it must be to live ignorant.

It just means the vaccine does not reduce your chances of hospitalization by 100%. It is "only" reducing them by 90+%.

Oh we're just guessing numbers now? How quickly the discussion devolves into something other than science.

hospitalizations in the 70+ population. That group is nearly 100% double vaccinated in Scotland.

Double vaccinated and hospitalized. Must mean the vaccine is working, right?

We're talking about Washington, a one-party state with extreme left politics. This is how it actually works:

Vaccinated person goes to the hospital for a cough and fever - "oh no dear, it can't be COVID because you're vaccinated, it must be the common flu" - not counted.

Unvaccinated person comes in for a wrist sprain, tests positive on the PCR - "OMG UNVAXXED HOSPITALIZATION" - probably counted twice, too.

Exactly. We have no evidence of long-term effects, and are trusting the same people who told us a year ago that vaccines provide protection to tell us they're safe. It's asinine.