HN user
There is nothing wrong with working and liking your work. I have a passion for music and coding, working all day. Problem is that most people need to work for another reason; $$$ instead of passion, to avoid ending up in the streets. That's more like slavery.
It's a debug related question because it tests whether you realise "a" can be a getter. For the rest this line of code is so hideous, although it is accepted by the interpreter, it is in every aspect totally wrong to do such thing in your codebase.
This is a typical example of what is wrong and annoying with job interview questions. In a way it doesn't really matter if the line could possibly evaluate to true, it shouldn't be written in the first place. What in the world tells your NO answer about your skill to do the job you are applying for? That you're not smart enough? Come on, I'd be really pissed off with shit like this.
So many false assumptions in this post. As if only 1 miner is trying to mine a block. There is simply no way to know whether you or someone else is going to mine that specific block, it's totally random.
There are two ways to increase mining profitability: generate more revenue, or reduce expenses.
No. There are more ways. Mining the right coin at the right time and selling it at the right time for example.
Mining has a lot of common ground with investing in the stock market. It's not that simple.
There is no such thing as creating an original. Everyone and everything is inspired in some or many ways. You consciously or unconsciously select your source(s) of inspiration. The guitarist of Radiohead is not playing some never played before stuff, it's the basic guitar thing millions of guitarists play. Everybody is copying everybody, changing only slight bits.
The whole music industry is stolen. And the worse part of this issue is that Radiohead is not making a dollar less because of Lana Del Rey, instead they just want to make some more of of her.
For some reason most people in this world want to own too many things they never should own in the first place. Intellectual property should only come into play if it really harms the 'original' authors revenue because of a straight copy.
Hmm, this feels very misleading. What is the correlation between Github stars and real world usage? This is not statistics, it's just 1 variable.. It almost feels like Vue.js is going to take over React just because it received more Github stars? I use React already for years, never gave it a star on Github, and I think many with me.
Stopping the war on drugs and releasing the innocent would be more efficient.