awedisee

No self promotion. Against ToS.

Also. Before answering please explain to me how patent rights with foreigners work in China.

What country do you live in where stealing doesn't exist?

OP doing gods work by sharing the gist as a comment for a paid article. Wish more did this.

Oh thank god. Finally a man of the people who can show us how to optimize 10k worth of equipment.

Because we all have at least two of these. Shout out to OP!!

Pretty sure its a bot account. Look up the OP and you find they post multiple times a day and across 30+ sites that I counted.

Can't read.

Its a white drawf eating a comapion star for those that can't read the article.

Downvoted because this site is NOT optimized for mobile. It loads about 100km away from the text. How is that even possible? Its like those design competitions but you are purposely designing the worst version of a mobile blog. Congrats!!

You know a publicly traded company has to have fiduciary responsibility to its stakeholders.

That being said it seems financially negligent to force employees back into the office if its going to cause negative productivity or as the article says "cause your star employees to quit".

Browser doesn't work. Nice try.

Oh I know the problem! Its because its all behind paywalls. Lame.

I don't know why you would call this guy out for posting bs links and then NOT post the real story written by real reporters doing real work. Its almost like you are trying NOT to be helpful.

Karl Bode clearly has a hard on for Elon. He personally attacks him in every. Single. Paragraph. Without stating things like the first actual comment.

Sidibe has provided MORE USEFUL INFORMATION IN 2 UNDERSTANDABLE PARAGRAPHS!

Sidibe should go work in journalims. I know a job you can take.

This has been posted multiple times however the other posts have a full deep dive and explain the entire situation.

Strong words there bud. How do we know your vibe coded app is better? Any metrics or this all just 'hype'

Would have been nice if the article actually explained itself instead of making a statement and then assuming the reader has the exact same amount of knowledge about the subject as the author.

Chances are you've never invented anything or done anything extraordinary. Small minds think small things.

Enjoy being a simpleton.

No pricing just promises and a forced sign up to see anyt details.

Scam. Just a way to gather marketing contact lists.

Can't test without verifying email. Seems like its just misleading data collection.

Absolutely fascinating subject. Definitely learned a lot. Never knew about grassmanian geometry until now. Thanks for sharing.

Way cool. Thank you for sharing

Look. If you don't have the emotional consitution to handle putting your opinion online and then having other people say its wrong. Then don't do it.

I asked you nicely to explain yourself and you copped out and said "they failed. Period" like a child instead of having an intellectual conversation.

I'm not sorry.

[flagged]

Just because they are not there YET doesn't mean they have failed period. Every. Single. Business. That Elon is running has SOMETHING to do with creating a civilization on a different planet.

*SpaceX supplies the starship

*Starlink supplies communications

*xAI provides automation and the mesh brain of their robotsTesla builds 3 things: -a battery pack to store energy -an electric vehicle -the Optimus robot

*Boring company digs really big holes because there is no atmosphere to protect you on Mars like there is on earth, the first settlements will most likely be underground.

**Neuralink so humans can connect to the AI and other systems more seamlessly.

Every. Single. One. Useful in one way or another for interstellar travel and or living on another planet.

So explain to me exactly how YOU think SpaceX has "failed with Mars".

So you aren't capable of responding to comments?

Thanks for doing the internet version of texting someone and then throwing your phone into a river.

I hate articles like this because they use the steelman effect and hope you don't realize it.

"Steel manning (or steelmanning) is a rhetorical technique that involves strengthening the opponent’s position to its strongest possible form before critiquing it."

Allow me to explain.

In the beginning of the article it glosses over what it deems as the three waves of philanthropy.

What it does not mention is this is an entirely new and untraditional way of viewing the american "three waves of philanthropy". Traditionally this is the version used in philanthropy research:

Wave 1 (1890–1930): Institution‑building

Wave 2 (1930–1980): Scientific philanthropy

Wave 3 (1980–present): Tech‑driven, global, scalable philanthropy

This model is long‑arc, spanning 140 years.

As you can see " Obama era" would lie within the current 3rd wave.

This is problematic and highly gratuitous to the Gates foundation. I would consider the Gates foundation as being Philanthrocapitalists. Philanthrocapitalism is a way of doing philanthropy, which mirrors the way that business is done in the for-profit world. It may involve venture philanthropy that actively invests in social programs to pursue specific philanthropic goals that would yield return on investment over the long term, or in a more passive form whereby "social investors" benefit from investing in socially-responsible programs.

The Gates foundation recorded 8.08B in revenue with only 8.015B in spending creating a surplus and that's just in the foundation itself. While Gates himself has verbalized his wishes to close the foundation by 2045 - talk is cheap and actions speak louder so only time will tell.

What I think this article and its writer is TRYING to do is not mapping philanthropy across U.S. history but rather mapping how tech ideology evolved across three political eras: Bush → Obama → Trump.

This isn't the problem. The problem is taking a definition of a topic you know nothing about and adapting it for your own use and then pretending its a standard form of measurement.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philanthropy

https://www.gatesfoundation.org/about/financials/annual-repo...

https://www.gatesfoundation.org/ideas/media-center/press-rel...

I had no idea Jimmy Carr was a graduated physics student! Surely he's not just some comedian who is talking about a subject he doesn't truly understand and then trying and convince others that his level of knowledge is far greater than those that study this subject.

Way cool!

I don't understand what this means "It doesn't seem possible for Spacex to revolutionize the world, change it: sure they do...for 20+ years but they fail to revolutionize for 20+ years.And the reasons are obvious."

Please explain.