My argument is that all the vocabulary for computer science are things. Even if they are virtual, they are tangible. You can draw a picture and label a box "bytes".
Nothing in the ChatGPT conversation is tangible. It's all in the realm of concepts.
HN user
My argument is that all the vocabulary for computer science are things. Even if they are virtual, they are tangible. You can draw a picture and label a box "bytes".
Nothing in the ChatGPT conversation is tangible. It's all in the realm of concepts.
start-ups spend over 100% of revenue on risky ventures.
I'm stodgy, but I can't get past how they chose VERB-OBJECT instead of OBJECT-VERB. get-<tab> is useless. MSFT knew tab-completion would be a thing, yet they made it useless.
Fallout 1 & 2! Formative titles for young me.
For recorded music, you could always buffer however many milliseconds of audio to account for the processing.
Michael Bay just read "computronium" and spawned an 8 movie franchise in his head.
Well yeah. Cars kill 40x the people.
Seeing this while the 75 year old who killed a whole family of 4 with her car gets away without jail time...
Some pretty wild misplaced priorities.
I did the math. Twitter was down $1.3 billion over 10 years.
Anthropic lost $5.2 billion last year. So they are 40x better at spending investor money than Twitter.
Hard to call Twitter the archetype for Anthropic.
You just engaged in deflection and whataboutism on his behalf, but you aren't defending him?
It really seems like you're defending him.
Putting on my pedantic hat, does this qualify as a picture of the mountains? As in, is there any light hitting the mountains, then hitting the film/sensor?
Or is this just an elaborate silhouette?
Is that a difference? I don't know.
After 4 years of Russia/Ukraine, does anyone think that a terror group would take down an airliner with anything other than a drone? Why take any operational risk of actually going through security?
Off the top of my head, C# is both the language & the runtime. React only throws things over the fence to browsers.
Probably helps a lot to keep abstractions from leaking.
why bother learning two paradigms
Objection. Your React is ultimately turning into HTML so you DO have to learn HTML + CSS. You just have an abstraction over it.
The Pacific ocean is big.
Also, they run 24/7 at 100% capacity, so after only 1.5 years
How does OpenAI keep this load? I would expect the load at 2pm Eastern to be WAY bigger than the load after California goes to bed.
NextJS is web-scale.
Washington bridge rebuild maybe? The demolition of the piles is all that's left.
I heard a little DVa from Overwatch.
Work bought me a VisionTek hub. I wanted the 1 cable life - unfortunately, it only does monitors via DisplayLink, aka compressed & streamed to & from my desk. It's noticeably fuzzy.
So now it's 2 cables: 1 from the hub, 1 from the monitor. Both USB-C.
WTF guys?
My Apple monitor from 2009 just worked with 1 cable (no power, but still).
IMO that phrase came about when old tech companies (the IBMs of the world) had
* waterfall
* design up-front
* source control systems that
* defaulted all files to read-only
* required you to "check-out" files, potentially locking other devs out from editing them [1]
* probably didn't have unit tests so "deploying to prod" meant "doing a full QA pass, done by human beings"
* there was no CI/CD (We had "Build Engineers")
In this context, pushing a change to SVN/git/hg, having tests run automatically, then having CI/CD push new code to production, all as a side-effect of one engineer push a button? That was moving fast, and occasionally, breaking the whole website. But we got better tests, better CI/CD, metrics, green/blue, ... We learned it was unequivocally better than the old way.[1] Reserved Checkouts: https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/clearcase/11.0.0?topic=ucm-check...
And it has a brand
Didn't they change names months ago? I know them as Codeium.
Banning raw milk is for health. Banning research chemicals is mostly an extension of the war on drugs. They aren't the same.
Do you mean "walking away with the documents"?
Walking away from the documents is what your employer would like you to do.
This is screaming for a Raymond Chen post explaining the strange-but-true history behind it.
Pretty sure it was Labyrinth.
Sure, but you led with something that implied the opposite. Were I your editor, I'd've struck it.
"a great read" - Almost underselling it. It won the Pulitzer for non-fiction that year.
0.5 is so wild.
Gen1: 100 people: 50 men + 50 women; 50 women have 25 babies
Gen2: 26 people: 13 men + 12 women (for math); 12 women have 6 babies
Gen3: 6 people
So 100 people end up having 6 total grandkids between all of them.
In the US, you hear about Boomer grandparents who have at least 10 grandchildren.
Sounds like an amazing project. Looking forward to seeing what this becomes.