HN user
Ruby guys have made an attempt to introduce type system few years ago, but they found it nearly impossible to infer types from metaprogrammed code - which makes sense. So they came with the suggestion that you write types for dynamically generated methods yourself. Comeon!
With rails you'd always have to pay for absence of strict types with extensive testing where you'd basically have to verify that data structures match.
I don't buy it anymore
Every few years someone discovers FOR UPDATE SKIP LOCKED and represents it. I remember it lasting for 15 years at least
This one is not using webdrive, but raw chrome debugging protocol
cloudflare captcha can be easily passed with browser extension, not much different from the suggested bypass
Nah, homebrew made apple guys believe they get pretty much everything Linux has. Who would expect an exception?
You wouldn't know unless running crate install.
I use lsof -i a lot on Mac, its not that I'm criticizing, but mostly disappointed.
Cause it's obviously a Rust crate, you would kinda hope that it might compile at MacOs. In 99% of cases that works.
Think it should be explicitly stated that it is not available on Mac OS as procfs does not support it
AI is great for hit'n'go, but in the long run it brought us more trouble than help. It gets very inconsistent, does not track the context (especially if it is a common-sense context), brings in some weird architectural patterns by default, avoids updating current components preferring to write new almost exactly the same ones alongside with similar existing ones, e.t.c, e.t.c.
It's definitely a great tool to quickly bootstrap something, but I find myself thinking "I should have better done that myself" more and more.
Yep, this guy also delivered this nonsense when working as a president advisor. Since then I am genuinely surprised when someone brings ukrainian official statements on the table. Like, really guys?
Ukrainian Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council is definitely some local city madman
Pretty much yes. Basically FSB can perform MITM attacks any time they want, but it still requires an order.
It does not help a lot with end-to-end encryption though
Right, the US payed to scrape the military equipment.
It is a very well known meme to be honest
[1] https://www-pravda-com-ua.translate.goog/articles/2022/12/19...
It will work for sure, anything can be managed with the money.
It is a game you can play together
In exchange for $500M from Nunn-Lugar programme
Ukraine actually has inherited 19 TU-160s from USSR. 8 of which were transfered to Russia as a payment for natural gas, and 11 were disassembled.
Oh it’s already implemented since 2000, with SORM system. Think they are to extend it to give direct FSB access without pre-request starting from 1st of september
As far as I understood the biggest problem was not in the frame production itself, but in digitizing the Soviet era documentation for modern machinery.
They reported it done in 2018 and 2 new aircrafts are promised to be brand new. I doubt anyone would be able to reliably prove they coming with old frame or not.
Modern missiles have been developed to a point where those bombers would not necessarily have to leave russian airspace to release them. It concerns me a lot if those supersonic bombers are still valid today, but taking the fact Russia has 4 new tu-160 in production, I shoulda be wrong
Even in the traditional scenario it’s still unclear how would F35 compete in range with enormous antennas on both specific aircrafts like Е-3 or land-based defense systems.
Or is it more about fail safety rather than distance?
I believe its designed for bigger drones, where power supply would be the primary concern
Think Ukraine had its own airforce at the beginning, and for 30 years nobody stopped it from modernizing or acquiring new aircrafts.
Besides that, I doubt the US would have ever sold a single F35 to Ukraine just because of revealing radio-emission and reflection patterns to russian air defense, basically drawing F35 useless for future usage against Russia.
I don't mean those anti-drone systems should target regular aircrafts. Really cool F35 can target them and at the same time it’s highly unlikely F35 would have ever reached those distant airfields.
Quite easy to track though, like double sign-ins from different devices, uncommon locations, location and speed matching - like phone going 25mph in the forest.
And you don't need to permablock it, few minutes would be enough.
Russia has 50 nuclear submarines, of which 14 are ballistic missile carriers. Every couple of years they produce a new one, think its clear where the bets are on
Ukraine is damn good at media war, although it has nothing to do with real life.
The real marker is immediate numbers. I bet even Russians yet to find out how many aircrafts have they irrecoverably lost, however we get numbers reported as if they are confirmed.
Cheap
Yeah, basically not even the aircrafts are to blame, but insanely expensive and limited air defense systems.
You shouldn't be launching a patriot missile to take down a drone, that's the point